Senior leaders’ theories of action for managing subject departments as a school improvement strategy

The current study examines senior school leaders’ theories of action driving their decision-making around how they manage departments and distribute leadership to department heads. Based on a thematic analysis of transcripts of interviews with the principal, head of the curriculum unit, and two depa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducational management, administration & leadership Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 520 - 540
Main Authors Montecinos, Carmen, Cortez, Mónica, Zoro, Bárbara, Zett, Isabel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.05.2024
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1741-1432
1741-1440
DOI10.1177/17411432221089200

Cover

More Information
Summary:The current study examines senior school leaders’ theories of action driving their decision-making around how they manage departments and distribute leadership to department heads. Based on a thematic analysis of transcripts of interviews with the principal, head of the curriculum unit, and two department heads from nine high schools, four approaches for managing departments were identified: (a) quasi self-managing units; (b) hierarchical managerial control; (c) participatory management; and (d) transitioning from hierarchical control to incipient participatory management. All approaches, to varying degrees, involved hierarchical managerial control and, to a greater or lesser extent, department heads participated in decision-making. At the centre of the distinct patterns for the distribution of leadership associated with each management model was a concern for aligning teachers’ improvement priorities. These approaches are examined through a distributed leadership lens in terms of their potential affordances and constraints for strengthening the contributions of departments to school improvement processes. The main conclusion is that variations in how senior leaders manage departments for the distribution of leadership need to be understood in the context of a school's history and culture.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1741-1432
1741-1440
DOI:10.1177/17411432221089200