Comparing Common Average Referencing to Laplacian Referencing in Detecting Imagination and Intention of Movement for Brain Computer Interface
Brain-computer interface (BCI) is a paradigm that offers an alternative communication channel between neural activity generated in the brain and the user’s external environment. This paper investigates detection of intention of movement from surface EEG during actual and imagination of movement whic...
Saved in:
Published in | MATEC web of conferences Vol. 140; p. 1028 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Les Ulis
EDP Sciences
01.01.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2261-236X 2274-7214 2261-236X |
DOI | 10.1051/matecconf/201714001028 |
Cover
Summary: | Brain-computer interface (BCI) is a paradigm that offers an alternative communication channel between neural activity generated in the brain and the user’s external environment. This paper investigates detection of intention of movement from surface EEG during actual and imagination of movement which is essential for developing non-invasive BCI system for neuro-impaired patients. EEG signal was recorded from 11 subjects while imagining and performing right wrist movement in multiple directions using 28 electrodes based on international 10-20 standard electrode placement locations. The recorded EEG signal later was filtered and pre-processed by spatial filter namely; Common average reference (CAR) and Laplacian (LAP) filter. Features were extracted from the filtered signal using ERSP and power spectrum and classified by k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) classifiers. The classification results show that LAP filter has outperformed CAR with respect to classification. Classification accuracy ranged from 63.33% to 100% for detection of imagination of movement and 60% to 96.67% for detection of intention of actual movement. In both of detection of imagination and intention of movement k-NN classifier gave better result compared to QDA classifier. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1 SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1 content type line 21 |
ISSN: | 2261-236X 2274-7214 2261-236X |
DOI: | 10.1051/matecconf/201714001028 |