Contagion, counterterrorism and criminology: The Case of France

In the burgeoning criminological literature on security, risk and preventive justice which has followed the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers, ‘contagion’ or the deleterious effect of counterterrorist policies on the ordinary criminal law has been the subject of some discussion, mostly in the context...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCriminology & criminal justice Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 568 - 584
Main Authors Hamilton, Claire, Berlusconi, Giulia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.11.2018
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1748-8958
1748-8966
DOI10.1177/1748895817751829

Cover

More Information
Summary:In the burgeoning criminological literature on security, risk and preventive justice which has followed the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers, ‘contagion’ or the deleterious effect of counterterrorist policies on the ordinary criminal law has been the subject of some discussion, mostly in the context of the threat which such ‘exceptional’ policies pose to mainstream procedural values. This article seeks to build on this literature through an examination of the impact of post 9/11 counterterrorism law and policy on the ordinary criminal justice system in France. Given the extent to which counterterrorist law now encroaches on various aspects of French criminal law, the argument is made for greater criminological attention to be paid to the ‘trickle-down’ effect of extraordinary law on the ordinary business of the criminal justice system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1748-8958
1748-8966
DOI:10.1177/1748895817751829