ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: 2024 Update

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Radiology Vol. 21; no. 11; pp. S433 - S447
• Main Authors: Nagpal, Prashant, Dane, Bari, Aghayev, Ayaz, Fowler, Kathryn J., Hedgire, Sandeep S., Bartel, Twyla B., Cash, Brooks D., Collins, Jeremy D., Kirsch, David S., Lo, Hao S., Pietryga, Jason A., Ripley, Beth, Santillan, Cynthia S., Kim, David H., Steigner, Michael L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2024
• Subjects: appropriate use criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; AUC; CT angiography; Diagnostic Imaging - methods; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnostic imaging; Humans; imaging; nonvariceal bleeding; occult gastrointestinal bleeding; Societies, Medical; United States; upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB); United States; occult gastrointestinal bleeding; upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB); CT angiography; nonvariceal bleeding; appropriate use criteria; imaging; Appropriateness Criteria; AUC
• ISSN: 1546-1440; 1558-349X; 1558-349X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.021

This document summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of the initial imaging in five clinical scenarios in patients with suspected or known nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). These clinical scenarios include suspected nonvariceal UGIB without endoscopy performed; endoscopically confirmed nonvariceal UGIB with clear source but treatment not possible or continued bleeding after endoscopic treatment; endoscopically confirmed nonvariceal UGIB without a confirmed source; suspected nonvariceal UGIB with negative endoscopy; and postsurgical or post-traumatic nonvariceal UGIB when endoscopy is contraindicated. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios of nonvariceal UGIB. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.