High school students' expectancy, value, and cost profiles and their relations with engagement and achievement in Math and English

Based on situated expectancy-value theory, we aimed to investigate the latent profiles of high school students' expectancy, value, and cost beliefs in math and English domains using a person-centered approach. In addition, we compared student profiles regarding academic outcomes and personal ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLearning and individual differences Vol. 101; p. 102252
Main Authors Jiang, Yi, Zhang, Linjia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1041-6080
1873-3425
DOI10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102252

Cover

More Information
Summary:Based on situated expectancy-value theory, we aimed to investigate the latent profiles of high school students' expectancy, value, and cost beliefs in math and English domains using a person-centered approach. In addition, we compared student profiles regarding academic outcomes and personal characteristics. Latent profile analyses based on a sample of 1521 Chinese senior high school students identified five profiles: adaptive, moderately motivated, high cost, less motivated, and maladaptive. Profile patterns were highly consistent across the math and English domains. Furthermore, there were significant differences in students' engagement and achievement among the five latent profiles. These five profiles also demonstrated meaningful associations with student characteristics, including gender and socioeconomic status. Findings of the present study suggest the importance of taking into consideration of students' expectancy, value, and cost beliefs together to better understand their motivational dynamics in school. •We investigated Chinese high school students' motivational profiles.•Five distinguishable profiles of expectancy-value-cost beliefs were identified.•Profile patterns were highly consistent across the math and English domains.•There were significant differences in engagement and achievement across profiles.•Profiles demonstrated meaningful associations with student gender and SES.
ISSN:1041-6080
1873-3425
DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102252