Fundamental problems in fitting spatial cluster process models

Existing methods for fitting Neyman–Scott cluster process models to spatial point pattern data often fail to converge, or converge to implausible values of the parameters, or exhibit numerical instability. These failures have been viewed as weaknesses of the particular model-fitting method. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSpatial statistics Vol. 52; p. 100709
Main Authors Baddeley, Adrian, Davies, Tilman M., Hazelton, Martin L., Rakshit, Suman, Turner, Rolf
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2211-6753
2211-6753
DOI10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100709

Cover

More Information
Summary:Existing methods for fitting Neyman–Scott cluster process models to spatial point pattern data often fail to converge, or converge to implausible values of the parameters, or exhibit numerical instability. These failures have been viewed as weaknesses of the particular model-fitting method. However, we show that they are attributable to fundamental flaws in the model structure: The model is not closed under convergence in distribution; the Poisson process is not included in the model; cluster scale is unidentifiable when the model is close to a Poisson process. We obtain new results about properties of cluster processes, and about the distance from a cluster process to a Poisson process. We define an index of cluster strength φ which plays an important role in the analysis. Remedies for the fundamental problems are proposed: the model is extended to include the Poisson process by allowing φ=0; unidentifiability is remedied using shrinkage estimators involving a penalty on cluster scale. To improve understanding of the fitted model in applications we propose several derived parameters. The improved fitting methods are implemented in open source R code. Simulation experiments and real data examples demonstrate the improved performance.
ISSN:2211-6753
2211-6753
DOI:10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100709