The role of cesium-131 brachytherapy in brain tumors: a scoping review of the literature and ongoing clinical trials

Purpose Cesium-131 radioactive isotope has favored the resurgence of intracavitary brachytherapy in neuro-oncology, minimizing radiation-induced complications and maximizing logistical and clinical outcomes. We reviewed the literature on cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors. Methods PubMed, Web...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neuro-oncology Vol. 159; no. 1; pp. 117 - 133
Main Authors Palmisciano, Paolo, Haider, Ali S., Balasubramanian, Kishore, D’Amico, Randy S., Wernicke, Alla Gabriella
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.08.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0167-594X
1573-7373
1573-7373
DOI10.1007/s11060-022-04050-3

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose Cesium-131 radioactive isotope has favored the resurgence of intracavitary brachytherapy in neuro-oncology, minimizing radiation-induced complications and maximizing logistical and clinical outcomes. We reviewed the literature on cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors. Methods PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to include published studies and ongoing trials reporting cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors. Results We included 27 published studies comprising 279 patients with 293 lesions, and 3 ongoing trials. Most patients had brain metastases (63.1%), followed by high-grade gliomas (23.3%), of WHO Grade III (15.2%) and Grade IV (84.8%), and meningiomas (13.6%), mostly of WHO Grade II (62.8%) and Grade III (27.9%). Most brain metastases were newly diagnosed (72.3%), while most gliomas and meningiomas were recurrent (95.4% and 88.4%). Patients underwent gross-total (91.1%) or subtotal (8.9%) resection, with median postoperative cavity size of 3.5 cm (range 1–5.8 cm). A median of 20, 28, and 16 seeds were implanted in gliomas, meningiomas, and brain metastases, with median seed activity of 3.8 mCi (range 2.4–5 mCi). Median follow-up was 16.2 months (range 0.6–72 months). 1-year freedom from progression rates were local 94% (range 57–100%), regional 85.1% (range 55.6–93.8%), and distant 53.5% (range 26.3–67.4%). Post-treatment radiation necrosis, seizure, and surgical wound infection occurred in 3.4%, 4.7%, and 4.3% patients. Conclusion Initial data suggest that cesium-131 brachytherapy is safe and effective in primary or metastatic malignant brain tumors. Ongoing trials are evaluating long-term locoregional tumor control and future studies should analyze its role in multimodal systemic tumor management.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-594X
1573-7373
1573-7373
DOI:10.1007/s11060-022-04050-3