Clinical Quality Measures: A Challenge for–and to–Family Physicians

Improving design, selection and implementation of appropriate clinical quality measures can reduce harms and costs of health care and improve the quality and experience of care delivery. These measures have not been evaluated for appropriateness for use in performance measurement in a systematic, re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 427 - 434
Main Authors Drabkin, Alan, Adler, Ronald N., Altman, Wayne, Ehrlich, Alan M., Agnoli, Alicia, Alper, Brian S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1557-2625
1558-7118
1558-7118
DOI10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210294

Cover

More Information
Summary:Improving design, selection and implementation of appropriate clinical quality measures can reduce harms and costs of health care and improve the quality and experience of care delivery. These measures have not been evaluated for appropriateness for use in performance measurement in a systematic, reproducible, and widely accepted manner. We defined 10 criteria for evaluation of measure appropriateness in 4 domains: Patient-centeredness of outcomes, specification of population measured and measure detail, reliable evidence that benefits likely outweigh harms, and independence from significant confounders. We applied these criteria to 24 measures under consideration for statewide use in Massachusetts in public and private incentive-based programs. We appraised each measure as Appropriate or Not Appropriate for such use. We rated 15 measures as Appropriate (62.5%). Three measures (12.5%) were considered Appropriate only if applied at a system level but not for patient-provider assessment and 6 measures (25%) were rated Not Appropriate. Reasons for designation as "Not Appropriate" included benefits not clearly outweighing harms, lack of preservation of patient autonomy, inappropriate specification of population and measure detail, confounding by locus of control, and confounding by social determinants of health. Using this consensus-driven, 10-criteria methodology we were able to evaluate appropriateness of clinical quality measures. This methodology may improve measure design and inform selection of the most appropriate measures for use in quality measurement, financial incentives, and reporting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1557-2625
1558-7118
1558-7118
DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210294