Study of LCNF and CNF from pine and eucalyptus pulps

Nanocelluloses produced from wood pulp are widely studied for various economic applications. Most studies of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) use lignin-free fibres obtained from bleached pulps; however, unbleached fibres with residual lignin may also be used to obtain lignocelluloses nanofibrils (LCNF)....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNordic pulp & paper research Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 670 - 684
Main Authors Demuner, Iara Fontes, Colodette, Jorge Luiz, Gomes, Fernando José Borges, de Oliveira, Rubens Chaves
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published De Gruyter 01.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0283-2631
2000-0669
DOI10.1515/npprj-2019-0075

Cover

More Information
Summary:Nanocelluloses produced from wood pulp are widely studied for various economic applications. Most studies of cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) use lignin-free fibres obtained from bleached pulps; however, unbleached fibres with residual lignin may also be used to obtain lignocelluloses nanofibrils (LCNF). Research on lignocellulose nanofibrils is a recent subject in the field; thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the ultrastructure of lignocellulose nanofibrils compared to cellulose nanofibrils produced from the same raw material. Understanding of nanoparticle properties is of great relevance for their various applications; therefore, complete characterisation of the chemical, physical, and morphological structures of LCNF and CNF produced from pine and eucalyptus woods was performed. Unbleached cellulosic fibres are a viable alternative for LCNF production, which has properties comparable to that of traditional CNF production that uses lignin-free fibres. LCNF from pine and eucalyptus were obtained with 4.0 % and 1.8 % residual lignin, respectively. The nanofibrils had high thermal stability because LCNF had a higher maximum degradation temperature. Due to the low interaction of lignin with water, LCNF had a lower water retention value than CNF.
ISSN:0283-2631
2000-0669
DOI:10.1515/npprj-2019-0075