The Hype and Hope of Interdisciplinary Management Studies

Demand for multi‐, if not interdisciplinary, research is currently strong, especially from funding bodies. But it often leaves little more than a shrill echo within the corridors of management departments and business schools. Academic respectability still seems to remain with the single disciplinar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of management Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 9 - 22
Main Authors Knights, David, Willmott, Hugh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 01.03.1997
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1045-3172
1467-8551
DOI10.1111/1467-8551.00035

Cover

More Information
Summary:Demand for multi‐, if not interdisciplinary, research is currently strong, especially from funding bodies. But it often leaves little more than a shrill echo within the corridors of management departments and business schools. Academic respectability still seems to remain with the single disciplinary approach of economics, finance, sociology, etc. and also increasingly with those management subjects such as marketing, human‐resource management or operations research that depend upon other social sciences for their existence, although the latter have considerable difficulty in gaining recognition and respect from those in the disciplines from which they draw their theoretical inspiration. As academics struggle to find ways of bridging their separate and distinct disciplines, practitioner divisions are being questioned and eroded as they are increasingly regarded as dysfunctional in achieving the flexibility and speedy responses demanded of the modern corporation. This paper seeks to develop an analytical understanding of the obstacles to the development of interdisciplinary research and teaching in management.
Bibliography:istex:11710C5BE37BE2EB94F3C7C3F06460EBF708218C
ArticleID:BJOM035
The authors acknowledge support from ESRC PICT in preparing this paper. The views expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by other members of UMIST PICT or by members of other PICT research centres. An earlier version of this paper was delivered at the British Association of Management Annual Conference, 14-16 September 1992. We thank all those who offered their critical comments as well as the anonymous reviewers of this special issue.
ark:/67375/WNG-RK9JS9DN-2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1045-3172
1467-8551
DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.00035