Do comments and expertise still matter? An experiment on programmers’ adoption of AI-generated JavaScript code

This paper investigates the factors influencing programmers’ adoption of AI-generated JavaScript code recommendations within the context of lightweight, function-level programming tasks. It extends prior research by (1) utilizing objective (as opposed to the typically self-reported) measurements for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of systems and software Vol. 231; p. 112634
Main Authors Li, Changwen, Treude, Christoph, Turel, Ofir
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.01.2026
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0164-1212
1873-1228
DOI10.1016/j.jss.2025.112634

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper investigates the factors influencing programmers’ adoption of AI-generated JavaScript code recommendations within the context of lightweight, function-level programming tasks. It extends prior research by (1) utilizing objective (as opposed to the typically self-reported) measurements for programmers’ adoption of AI-generated code and (2) examining whether AI-generated comments added to code recommendations and development expertise drive AI-generated code adoption. We tested these potential drivers in an online experiment with 173 programmers. Participants were asked to answer some questions to demonstrate their level of development expertise. Then, they were asked to solve a LeetCode problem without AI support. After attempting to solve the problem on their own, they received an AI-generated solution to assist them in refining their solutions. The solutions provided were manipulated to include or exclude AI-generated comments (a between-subjects factor). Programmers’ adoption of AI-generated code was gauged by code similarity between AI-generated solutions and participants’ submitted solutions, providing a behavioral measurement of code adoption behaviors. Our findings revealed that, within the context of function-level programming tasks, the presence of comments significantly influences programmers’ adoption of AI-generated code regardless of the participants’ development expertise. •Comments in AI-generated code significantly boost adoption among programmers, regardless of development expertise. Both novice and expert programmers were more likely to integrate AI-generated code when comments were present.•Development expertise does not significantly affect the adoption of AI-generated code, suggesting that supportive code features matter more than expertise alone.•We developed a novel objective measure of AI code adoption by applying PCA to four code similarity metrics.
ISSN:0164-1212
1873-1228
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.112634