Enhancing Airborne Laser Scanning-Based Growing Stock Volume Models with Climate and Site-Specific Information

• Published in: Forests Vol. 16; no. 5; p. 815
• Main Authors: Tangwa, Elvis, Tracz, Wiktor, Erfanifard, Yousef, Mielcarek, Miłosz, Stereńczak, Krzysztof
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 14.05.2025
• Subjects: Accuracy; Airborne lasers; Biomass; Climate models; Environmental factors; Forests; Laser applications; Lasers; Microclimate; Mixed forests; Permutations; Precipitation; Regression analysis; Remote sensing; Statistics; Stocks; Temperature; Vegetation; Poland; Europe
• ISSN: 1999-4907; 1999-4907
• DOI: 10.3390/f16050815

Forests grow under dynamic conditions influenced by vegetation structure and environmental factors. However, empirical models to enhance growing stock volume GSV) estimation are commonly established based on structural information from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data, raising important questions regarding the models’ performance across time (temporal transferability). This study presents the integration of ALS and microclimate and site-specific data to assess the temporal transferability of GSV models at the plot level in a mixed forest located in Milicz, Poland, between 2007 (t1) and 2015 (t2). We compared random forest (RF), multiple linear regression (MLR), and generalized additive models (GAMs) across three modelling scenarios, ALS + site type + climate (sa), ALS only (sb), and ALS + site type (sc), and also performed internal and external validation to assess temporal transferability. Among the three modelling approaches, GAMs outperformed the MLR and RF models in internal validation, improving the R2 by 6%–8% and reducing the rRMSE by 6%–12%. We found that climate was significant in GSV prediction when integrated with ALS and site conditions, with a permutation test (p ≤ 0.023) based on the rRMSE confirming climate significance. The direct contribution of climate to model performance was marginal on a broad scale. However, its influence on GSV and temporal transferability seem stronger in homogenous sites. In general, RF was the most stable in both the forward (t1→t2) and backward (t2→t1) directions in the sa scenario unlike the GAM, which was more stable in the backward direction. This study provides a framework for assessing the reliability of GSV models and addresses a critical gap in forest monitoring.