Failure-Resilient Coverage Maximization With Multiple Robots

The task of maximizing coverage using multiple robots has several applications such as surveillance, exploration, and environmental monitoring. A major challenge of deploying such multi-robot systems in a practical scenario is to ensure resilience against robot failures. A recent work (L. Zhou et al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE robotics and automation letters Vol. 6; no. 2; pp. 3894 - 3901
Main Authors Ishat-E-Rabban, Md, Tokekar, Pratap
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 01.04.2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2377-3766
2377-3766
DOI10.1109/LRA.2021.3067275

Cover

More Information
Summary:The task of maximizing coverage using multiple robots has several applications such as surveillance, exploration, and environmental monitoring. A major challenge of deploying such multi-robot systems in a practical scenario is to ensure resilience against robot failures. A recent work (L. Zhou et al., 2019) introduced the Resilient Coverage Maximization ( RCM ) problem where the goal is to maximize a submodular coverage utility when the robots are subject to adversarial attacks or failures. The RCM problem is known to be NP-hard. In this letter, we propose two approximation algorithms for the RCM problem, namely, the Ordered Greedy ( OrG ) and the Local Search ( LS ) algorithm. Both algorithms empirically outperform the state-of-the-art solution in terms of accuracy and running time. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed solution, we empirically compare our proposed algorithms with the existing solution and a brute force optimal algorithm. We also perform a case study on the persistent monitoring problem to show the applicability of our proposed algorithms in a practical setting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2377-3766
2377-3766
DOI:10.1109/LRA.2021.3067275