Optimal hybrid classification model for event recommendation system

There is a growing need for recommender systems and other ML-based systems as an abundance of data is now available across all industries. Various industries are currently using recommender systems in slightly different ways. These programs utilize algorithms to propose appropriate products to consu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWeb Intelligence Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 167 - 184
Main Authors BN, Nithya, Geetha, D. Evangelin, Kumar, Manish
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 22.04.2024
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2405-6456
2405-6464
DOI10.3233/WEB-220137

Cover

More Information
Summary:There is a growing need for recommender systems and other ML-based systems as an abundance of data is now available across all industries. Various industries are currently using recommender systems in slightly different ways. These programs utilize algorithms to propose appropriate products to consumers based on their prior choices and interactions. Moreover, Systems for recommending events to users suggest pertinent happenings that they might find interesting. As opposed to an object recommender that suggests books or movies; event-based recommender systems typically require distinct algorithms. A developed event recommendation method is introduced which includes two stages: feature extraction and recommendation. In stage, I, a Set of features like personal willingness, community willingness, informative content, edge weight, and node interest degree are extracted. Stage II of the event recommendation system performs a hybrid classification by combining LSTM and CNN. In the LSTM classifier, optimal tuning is done by Improvised Cat and Mouse optimization (ICMO) algorithm. The results of the ICMO technique at an 80% training percentage have the maximum sensitivity value of 95.19%, whereas those of the existing approaches SSA, DINGO, BOA, and CMBO have values of 93.89%, 93.35%, 92.36%, and 92.24%. Finally, the best result is then determined by evaluating the whole performance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2405-6456
2405-6464
DOI:10.3233/WEB-220137