Metric Methods for the Biological Profile in Forensic Anthropology: Sex, Ancestry, and Stature

• Published in: Academic forensic pathology Vol. 6; no. 3; pp. 391 - 399
• Main Author: Spradley, M. Kate
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.09.2016
• Subjects: Invited Review; Forensic anthropology; Sex esitmation; Stature estimation; Forensic pathology; Biological profile; Ancestry estimation
• ISSN: 1925-3621; 1925-3621
• DOI: 10.23907/2016.040

The biological profile, conducted by a forensic anthropologist, is necessary for severely decomposed or skeletonized remains. The biological profile consists of estimates of sex, age, ancestry, and stature. It is crucial to have a correct estimate of sex, as this designation will narrow down the search through missing persons reports by half (e.g., searching through NamUs). However, sex estimates can be population specific, necessitating accurate ancestry estimation. When estimates of age and stature are added, the search narrows further. If these estimates are incorrect, the unidentified human remains may never be identified. These biological profile components are estimated based on either metric or nonmetric methods (visual observation and recording of categorical data). While age is inherently nonmetric, stature is inherently metric. Estimates of sex and ancestry can take a metric or nonmetric approach. The purpose of this review article is to review metric methods in forensic anthropology (sex, ancestry, and stature), to provide general knowledge of why and how these metric methods work, and to highlight that estimates of sex, ancestry, and stature do not subscribe to a “one size fits all” model.