Are Terrestrial Organisms Able to Live in Contaminated Soil after Fire-Fighting?

There was performed test of ecotoxicity with using earthworm Eisenia Fetida as chief representative of terrestrial organisms in the study. Soil matrix LUFA 2.3 was selected as a model of natural soil environment. Tested FEAs were follows: Sthamex F-15, Moussol-APS F-15 and Finiflam F-15. For experim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials Science Forum Vol. 851; pp. 125 - 129
Main Authors Zlamalova Gargosova, Helena, Hřibová, Šárka, Vavrova, Milada
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Pfaffikon Trans Tech Publications Ltd 01.04.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN3038357804
9783038357803
ISSN0255-5476
1662-9752
1662-9752
DOI10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.851.125

Cover

More Information
Summary:There was performed test of ecotoxicity with using earthworm Eisenia Fetida as chief representative of terrestrial organisms in the study. Soil matrix LUFA 2.3 was selected as a model of natural soil environment. Tested FEAs were follows: Sthamex F-15, Moussol-APS F-15 and Finiflam F-15. For experimental purposes, laboratory installation for infiltration was designed and compiled. Infiltration of three FEAs solutions was done before the ecotoxicity testing. Contaminated soil after infiltration was tested for semi-chronic ecotoxicity and reproduction ecotoxicity then. Introductory results indicates differences between each FEA, caused by various composition. Sthamex F-15 was determined as the most ecotoxic agent at all. Whilst Moussol-APS F-15 was evaluated as the agent with least ecotoxicity effect.
Bibliography:Selected, peer reviewed papers from the the 6th conference on Chemistry & Life 2015, September 2-4, 2015, Brno, Czech Republic
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISBN:3038357804
9783038357803
ISSN:0255-5476
1662-9752
1662-9752
DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.851.125