Glycaemic control and variability with different commercially available hybrid closed loop systems in people with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

To provide an updated analysis of the performance of different hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on subjects with type 1 diabetes. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched four online databases and performed hand-searching of conference p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes, obesity & metabolism
Main Authors Di Molfetta, Sergio, Di Gioia, Ludovico, Caruso, Irene, Caporusso, Mariangela, Trerotoli, Paolo, Natalicchio, Annalisa, Perrini, Sebastio, Laviola, Luigi, Giorgino, Francesco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 29.09.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI10.1111/dom.70150

Cover

More Information
Summary:To provide an updated analysis of the performance of different hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on subjects with type 1 diabetes. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched four online databases and performed hand-searching of conference proceedings to find studies from inception to 18 April 2025. We included RCTs enrolling subjects with type 1 diabetes, evaluating commercial HCL systems against other insulin therapy regimens, with a duration of intervention ≥2 weeks, and reporting time in range (TIR) as an outcome. Studies involving pregnant women were excluded. A total of 37 studies evaluating seven different HCL systems (CamAPS Fx, Control IQ, DBLG1, iLet BP, MiniMed 670G, MiniMed 780G, and Omnipod 5) were included. In studies with a mean age < 18 years, mean TIR was 64.1% (95% CI: 61-67.2), ranging from 59.3% (95% CI: 49.6-69.1) with MiniMed 780G to 68% (95% CI: 65.8-70.3) with Control IQ, and end-of-study HbA1c was 7.4% (95% CI: 7-7.7), ranging from 6.7% (95% CI: 6.6-6.9) with CamAPS Fx to 7.9% (95% CI: 6.9-9) with MiniMed 780G. In studies with a mean age ≥ 18 years, mean TIR was 70.8% (95% CI: 68.6-73), ranging from 63.1% (95% CI: 59.4-66.8) with Omnipod 5 to 74.4% (95% CI: 69.7-79.1) with MiniMed 780G, and end-of-study HbA1c was 7.1% (95% CI: 7-7.3), ranging from 7.0% (95% CI: 6.9-7.1) with Control IQ to 7.2% (95% CI: 7-7.5) with MiniMed 670G. In RCTs, commercial HCL systems show different achievements of CGM metrics and HbA1c in people with type 1 diabetes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.70150