Glycaemic control and variability with different commercially available hybrid closed loop systems in people with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
To provide an updated analysis of the performance of different hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on subjects with type 1 diabetes. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched four online databases and performed hand-searching of conference p...
Saved in:
| Published in | Diabetes, obesity & metabolism |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
29.09.2025
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1462-8902 1463-1326 1463-1326 |
| DOI | 10.1111/dom.70150 |
Cover
| Summary: | To provide an updated analysis of the performance of different hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on subjects with type 1 diabetes.
We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched four online databases and performed hand-searching of conference proceedings to find studies from inception to 18 April 2025. We included RCTs enrolling subjects with type 1 diabetes, evaluating commercial HCL systems against other insulin therapy regimens, with a duration of intervention ≥2 weeks, and reporting time in range (TIR) as an outcome. Studies involving pregnant women were excluded.
A total of 37 studies evaluating seven different HCL systems (CamAPS Fx, Control IQ, DBLG1, iLet BP, MiniMed 670G, MiniMed 780G, and Omnipod 5) were included. In studies with a mean age < 18 years, mean TIR was 64.1% (95% CI: 61-67.2), ranging from 59.3% (95% CI: 49.6-69.1) with MiniMed 780G to 68% (95% CI: 65.8-70.3) with Control IQ, and end-of-study HbA1c was 7.4% (95% CI: 7-7.7), ranging from 6.7% (95% CI: 6.6-6.9) with CamAPS Fx to 7.9% (95% CI: 6.9-9) with MiniMed 780G. In studies with a mean age ≥ 18 years, mean TIR was 70.8% (95% CI: 68.6-73), ranging from 63.1% (95% CI: 59.4-66.8) with Omnipod 5 to 74.4% (95% CI: 69.7-79.1) with MiniMed 780G, and end-of-study HbA1c was 7.1% (95% CI: 7-7.3), ranging from 7.0% (95% CI: 6.9-7.1) with Control IQ to 7.2% (95% CI: 7-7.5) with MiniMed 670G.
In RCTs, commercial HCL systems show different achievements of CGM metrics and HbA1c in people with type 1 diabetes. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1462-8902 1463-1326 1463-1326 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/dom.70150 |