Comparing dark matter models,modified Newtonian dynamics and modified gravity in accounting for galaxy rotation curves
We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the...
Saved in:
| Published in | Chinese physics C Vol. 41; no. 5; pp. 135 - 143 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
01.05.2017
|
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1674-1137 0254-3052 |
| DOI | 10.1088/1674-1137/41/5/055101 |
Cover
| Abstract | We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the modified Newtonian dynamics models,we discuss Milgrom's MOND theory with two different interpolation functions,the standard and the simple interpolation functions.For the modified gravity,we focus on Moffat's MSTG theory.We fit these models to the observed rotation curves of 9 high-surface brightness and 9 low-surface brightness galaxies.We apply the Bayesian Information Criterion and the Akaike Information Criterion to test the goodness-of-fit of each model.It is found that none of the six models can fit all the galaxy rotation curves well.Two galaxies can be best fitted by the baryonic model without involving nonluminous dark matter.MOND can fit the largest number of galaxies,and only one galaxy can be best fitted by the MSTG model.Core-modified model fits about half the LSB galaxies well,but no HSB galaxies,while the NFW model fits only a small fraction of HSB galaxies but no LSB galaxies.This may imply that the oversimplified NFW and core-modified profiles cannot model the postulated dark matter haloes well. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the modified Newtonian dynamics models,we discuss Milgrom's MOND theory with two different interpolation functions,the standard and the simple interpolation functions.For the modified gravity,we focus on Moffat's MSTG theory.We fit these models to the observed rotation curves of 9 high-surface brightness and 9 low-surface brightness galaxies.We apply the Bayesian Information Criterion and the Akaike Information Criterion to test the goodness-of-fit of each model.It is found that none of the six models can fit all the galaxy rotation curves well.Two galaxies can be best fitted by the baryonic model without involving nonluminous dark matter.MOND can fit the largest number of galaxies,and only one galaxy can be best fitted by the MSTG model.Core-modified model fits about half the LSB galaxies well,but no HSB galaxies,while the NFW model fits only a small fraction of HSB galaxies but no LSB galaxies.This may imply that the oversimplified NFW and core-modified profiles cannot model the postulated dark matter haloes well. |
| Author | 林昕 唐丽 林海南 |
| AuthorAffiliation | Department of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 林昕 唐丽 林海南 |
| BookMark | eNqFkF1LwzAUhoNMcJv-BCF4be1J0rQZXsnwC0Rv9LpkaVKjbTLTbNp_b8vGLrwRDrwX5zwvh2eGJs47jdA5gSsCQqQkL7KEEFakGUl5CpwTIEdoCpRnCQNOJ2h6uDlBs677AMizAZ2i7dK3axmsq3ElwyduZYw64NZXuukuh7DG6go_6-_onZUOV72TrVUdlq7Ch30d5NbGHluHpVJ-4-LYaHzAtWzkT4-DjzJa77DahK3uTtGxkU2nz_Y5R293t6_Lh-Tp5f5xefOUKCogJiKjjLG8YEIDMwoySitgxBCiVkITbRhkghawWFTGMFNUTGleUKVgpRgXgs3R9a5XBd91QZtS2d0jMUjblATKUWE56ilHPWVGSl7uFA40_0Ovg21l6P_lLvbcu3f116DiAOYFBbEYhv0CVROERQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1088_1674_4527_ad21d5 crossref_primary_10_3390_universe7010018 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_109_064046 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12648_021_02027_y crossref_primary_10_22531_muglajsci_1295528 crossref_primary_10_1093_mnras_staa967 crossref_primary_10_1088_1674_4527_21_11_271 crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_96_083523 crossref_primary_10_1093_mnras_stz1369 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10773_024_05801_w |
| Cites_doi | 10.1086/161131 10.1086/116660 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083509 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.211303 10.1023/A:1003642921142 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11981.x 10.1086/142670 10.1051/0004-6361:20041879 10.1086/150474 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.161301 10.1086/164021 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09474.x 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084046 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/109 10.1086/309560 10.1086/498208 10.1086/113063 10.1086/182804 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/380 10.1142/4948 10.1086/161130 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2648 10.1214/aos/1176344136 10.1086/323448 10.1086/177173 10.1093/mnras/274.1.235 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 10.1086/304888 10.1086/178131 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/020 10.1086/168845 10.1093/mnras/249.3.523 10.1086/508988 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084008 10.1023/A:1026672604958 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/004 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/05/003 10.1093/mnras/278.2.488 10.1086/158003 10.1086/305986 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137 10.1093/mnras/sts175 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13198.x 10.1086/500805 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06165.x 10.1093/mnras/283.1.18 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP ~WA AAYXX CITATION |
| DOI | 10.1088/1674-1137/41/5/055101 |
| DatabaseName | 维普期刊资源整合服务平台 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 维普中文期刊数据库 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
| DatabaseTitleList | |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Physics |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Comparing dark matter models,modified Newtonian dynamics and modified gravity in accounting for galaxy rotation curves |
| EISSN | 0254-3052 |
| EndPage | 143 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1088_1674_1137_41_5_055101 672089089 |
| GroupedDBID | 02O 1JI 1WK 29B 2B. 2C. 2RA 4.4 5B3 5GY 5VR 5VS 7.M 92E 92I 92L 92Q 93N AAGCD AAGID AAJIO AAJKP AALHV AATNI ABCXL ABHWH ABJNI ACAFW ACGFS ACHIP AENEX AFUIB AFYNE AIBLX AKPSB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ATQHT BBWZM CCEZO CCVFK CEBXE CHBEP CJUJL CQIGP CRLBU CW9 DU5 EBS EDWGO EJD EPQRW EQZZN ER. FA0 FEDTE HVGLF IJHAN IOP IZVLO JCGBZ KNG KOT M45 N5L NT- NT. OK1 PJBAE Q02 RIN RNS ROL RPA RW3 SY9 TCJ TGP W28 ~WA -SA -SC -S~ AAYXX ADEQX AEINN AERVB AOAED CAJEA CAJEC CITATION Q-- U1G U5K U5M |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-8423336738e03fc0422d031f11cb8e1ef304827099dff3f7d3ce572cc0bc35883 |
| ISSN | 1674-1137 |
| IngestDate | Thu Apr 24 22:52:53 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:43:19 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 14 10:03:01 EST 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining http://iopscience.iop.org/page/copyright |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c280t-8423336738e03fc0422d031f11cb8e1ef304827099dff3f7d3ce572cc0bc35883 |
| Notes | 11-5641/O4 We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the modified Newtonian dynamics models,we discuss Milgrom's MOND theory with two different interpolation functions,the standard and the simple interpolation functions.For the modified gravity,we focus on Moffat's MSTG theory.We fit these models to the observed rotation curves of 9 high-surface brightness and 9 low-surface brightness galaxies.We apply the Bayesian Information Criterion and the Akaike Information Criterion to test the goodness-of-fit of each model.It is found that none of the six models can fit all the galaxy rotation curves well.Two galaxies can be best fitted by the baryonic model without involving nonluminous dark matter.MOND can fit the largest number of galaxies,and only one galaxy can be best fitted by the MSTG model.Core-modified model fits about half the LSB galaxies well,but no HSB galaxies,while the NFW model fits only a small fraction of HSB galaxies but no LSB galaxies.This may imply that the oversimplified NFW and core-modified profiles cannot model the postulated dark matter haloes well. galaxy galaxies rotation Newtonian gravity interpolation accounting Bayesian brightness fitted Xin Li Li Tang Hai-Nan Lin( 1 Department of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China 2 CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China) |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1674_1137_41_5_055101 crossref_primary_10_1088_1674_1137_41_5_055101 chongqing_primary_672089089 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2017-05-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2017 text: 2017-05-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationTitle | Chinese physics C |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Chinese Physica C |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| References | 44 49 de Blok W. J. G. (6) 2008; 136 Merritt D. (39) 2006; 132 Palunas P. (47) 2000; 120 Swaters R. A. (19) 2010; 718 50 53 10 54 12 13 14 15 18 de Vaucouleurs G. (34) 1959; 53 Horava P. (27) 2009; 0903 1 2 3 4 Sanders R. H. (17) 1998; 503 7 8 Kun E. (48) 20 23 24 25 26 Sanders R. H. (16) 1996; 473 28 Zhao H. S. (45) 2006; 638 29 Burkert A. (38) 1995; 447 Oort J. H. (11) 1932; 6 Navarro J. F. (31) 1997; 490 Brownstein J. R. (32) 30 33 35 36 37 Moffat J. W. (21) 2005; 0505 Walter F. (5) 2008; 136 Brownstein J. R. (46) 2006; 636 Chemin L. (9) 2011; 142 Moffat J. W. (22) 2006; 0603 McGaugh S. S. (51) 2001; 122 40 41 42 Kim J. H. (52) 2007 43 |
| References_xml | – ident: 13 doi: 10.1086/161131 – ident: 50 doi: 10.1086/116660 – ident: 8 doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083509 – ident: 29 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.211303 – ident: 24 doi: 10.1023/A:1003642921142 – ident: 18 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11981.x – volume: 120 start-page: 2884 year: 2000 ident: 47 publication-title: Astrophys. – ident: 10 doi: 10.1086/142670 – ident: 48 – ident: 33 doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041879 – volume: 53 start-page: 311 year: 1959 ident: 34 publication-title: Hdb. d. Phys – ident: 35 doi: 10.1086/150474 – ident: 28 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.161301 – ident: 14 doi: 10.1086/164021 – ident: 44 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09474.x – ident: 20 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084046 – volume: 142 start-page: 109 year: 2011 ident: 9 publication-title: AJ doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/109 – volume: 447 start-page: L25 issn: 1538-4357 year: 1995 ident: 38 publication-title: Astrophys. J. Lett. doi: 10.1086/309560 – volume: 636 start-page: 721 issn: 0004-637X year: 2006 ident: 46 publication-title: ApJ doi: 10.1086/498208 – ident: 3 doi: 10.1086/113063 – ident: 1 doi: 10.1086/182804 – volume: 6 start-page: 249 issn: 0927-3050 year: 1932 ident: 11 publication-title: Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands – volume: 718 start-page: 380 issn: 0004-637X year: 2010 ident: 19 publication-title: ApJ doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/380 – ident: 25 doi: 10.1142/4948 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1086/161130 – volume: 136 start-page: 2648 year: 2008 ident: 6 publication-title: AJ doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2648 – ident: 53 doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136 – volume: 122 start-page: 2381 issn: 1538-3881 year: 2001 ident: 51 publication-title: AJ doi: 10.1086/323448 – ident: 30 doi: 10.1086/177173 – ident: 36 doi: 10.1093/mnras/274.1.235 – ident: 54 doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 – volume: 490 start-page: 493 issn: 0004-637X year: 1997 ident: 31 publication-title: Astrophys. doi: 10.1086/304888 – volume: 473 start-page: 117 issn: 0004-637X year: 1996 ident: 16 publication-title: ApJ doi: 10.1086/178131 – volume: 0903 start-page: 020 year: 2009 ident: 27 publication-title: JHEP doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/020 – year: 2007 ident: 52 – ident: 40 doi: 10.1086/168845 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1093/mnras/249.3.523 – volume: 132 start-page: 2685 issn: 1538-3881 year: 2006 ident: 39 publication-title: AJ doi: 10.1086/508988 – ident: 32 – ident: 26 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084008 – ident: 23 doi: 10.1023/A:1026672604958 – volume: 0603 start-page: 004 year: 2006 ident: 22 publication-title: JCAP doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/004 – volume: 136 start-page: 2563 year: 2008 ident: 5 publication-title: AJ doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563 – volume: 0505 start-page: 003 year: 2005 ident: 21 publication-title: JCAP doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/05/003 – ident: 41 doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.2.488 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1086/158003 – volume: 503 start-page: 97 issn: 0004-637X year: 1998 ident: 17 publication-title: ApJ doi: 10.1086/305986 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137 – ident: 42 doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts175 – ident: 43 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13198.x – volume: 638 start-page: L9 issn: 1538-4357 year: 2006 ident: 45 publication-title: ApJ doi: 10.1086/500805 – ident: 37 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06165.x – ident: 49 doi: 10.1093/mnras/283.1.18 |
| SSID | ssj0064088 |
| Score | 2.1266334 |
| Snippet | We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in... |
| SourceID | crossref chongqing |
| SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 135 |
| Title | Comparing dark matter models,modified Newtonian dynamics and modified gravity in accounting for galaxy rotation curves |
| URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/92043A/201705/672089089.html |
| Volume | 41 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVIOP databaseName: IOP Science Platform customDbUrl: eissn: 0254-3052 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0064088 issn: 1674-1137 databaseCode: IOP dateStart: 20080101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://iopscience.iop.org/ providerName: IOP Publishing |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nj9MwELXKIiQuKz5FdwH5gE8lbdzYsXNs2qwWDsBhV9pblDgOVAsplHYF_CJ-JjNx4nYFWgGXaGQ7dpX3OjNOxjOEvKijMrSlrgJTViYQdWyD0iZlUEgVyrou42nZBsi-iU_PxesLeTEY_NyLWtpuyrH58cdzJf-DKrQBrnhK9h-Q9ZNCA8iAL1wBYbj-FcZzV0QQNvtVsb4cfWpzZbriNggPCMsaXUzQZODi4V-5cgXoXWJm3481iNAbXzajYlc9AgMQwX4U376P1qsuKNFs11dd1GHn0bJMsFSz2YJlkiUpS0FQTCdslqCQhEzHc5adsHTOkhnLNNMwiLMsZknMtOpGax9S2_ZkLFGtoFkiR-3UAudyi6WL0bVRqWSpwkF6wVwcbv8iA4yjDxvsdG-sRMC5ywEztk4Hwv41AJV0TWELvkdMuad9uct80hly7vI__WYjQK_i64p-NSz-hEajzbEhUUXtTKMPWIzVNNT4ifQWuT0F-4FFQl69fdfb_FiEbYVTP2l_VkzriW-bCD6RE7cEZvL4sGrefwE49zyiPdfm7B457PYkdOYIdp8MbPOA3Gljg83Xh-TK04wizaijGXU0e9mTiHqS0Z5kFEhGfX9HMrps6I5kFEhGHcloTzLqSPaInJ9kZ_PToCvXEZipDjeBBs88irCKrA2j2mByuQpMRs25KbXlto5CzDkLW5KqrqNaVZGxUk2NCUsTSa2jx-SgWTX2CaHWqFhWSthCoPdUFTwxYIus5bGNlLZDcuwfX_7ZpWXJPUZDIvoHmpsu0z0WXPmYtxEXWueISY6Y5ILnMneYDMnY39bPeeMNRzf-imNyd8fyp-Rgs97aZ-DAbsrnLXd-AV2qhzM |
| linkProvider | IOP Publishing |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+dark+matter+models%2Cmodified+Newtonian+dynamics+and+modified+gravity+in+accounting+for+galaxy+rotation+curves&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%89%A9%E7%90%86C%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=%E6%9E%97%E6%98%95+%E5%94%90%E4%B8%BD+%E6%9E%97%E6%B5%B7%E5%8D%97&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.issn=1674-1137&rft.eissn=0254-3052&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1674-1137%2F41%2F5%2F055101&rft.externalDocID=672089089 |
| thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F92043A%2F92043A.jpg |