Comparing dark matter models,modified Newtonian dynamics and modified gravity in accounting for galaxy rotation curves

We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChinese physics C Vol. 41; no. 5; pp. 135 - 143
Main Author 林昕 唐丽 林海南
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.05.2017
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1674-1137
0254-3052
DOI10.1088/1674-1137/41/5/055101

Cover

Abstract We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the modified Newtonian dynamics models,we discuss Milgrom's MOND theory with two different interpolation functions,the standard and the simple interpolation functions.For the modified gravity,we focus on Moffat's MSTG theory.We fit these models to the observed rotation curves of 9 high-surface brightness and 9 low-surface brightness galaxies.We apply the Bayesian Information Criterion and the Akaike Information Criterion to test the goodness-of-fit of each model.It is found that none of the six models can fit all the galaxy rotation curves well.Two galaxies can be best fitted by the baryonic model without involving nonluminous dark matter.MOND can fit the largest number of galaxies,and only one galaxy can be best fitted by the MSTG model.Core-modified model fits about half the LSB galaxies well,but no HSB galaxies,while the NFW model fits only a small fraction of HSB galaxies but no LSB galaxies.This may imply that the oversimplified NFW and core-modified profiles cannot model the postulated dark matter haloes well.
AbstractList We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the modified Newtonian dynamics models,we discuss Milgrom's MOND theory with two different interpolation functions,the standard and the simple interpolation functions.For the modified gravity,we focus on Moffat's MSTG theory.We fit these models to the observed rotation curves of 9 high-surface brightness and 9 low-surface brightness galaxies.We apply the Bayesian Information Criterion and the Akaike Information Criterion to test the goodness-of-fit of each model.It is found that none of the six models can fit all the galaxy rotation curves well.Two galaxies can be best fitted by the baryonic model without involving nonluminous dark matter.MOND can fit the largest number of galaxies,and only one galaxy can be best fitted by the MSTG model.Core-modified model fits about half the LSB galaxies well,but no HSB galaxies,while the NFW model fits only a small fraction of HSB galaxies but no LSB galaxies.This may imply that the oversimplified NFW and core-modified profiles cannot model the postulated dark matter haloes well.
Author 林昕 唐丽 林海南
AuthorAffiliation Department of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 林昕 唐丽 林海南
BookMark eNqFkF1LwzAUhoNMcJv-BCF4be1J0rQZXsnwC0Rv9LpkaVKjbTLTbNp_b8vGLrwRDrwX5zwvh2eGJs47jdA5gSsCQqQkL7KEEFakGUl5CpwTIEdoCpRnCQNOJ2h6uDlBs677AMizAZ2i7dK3axmsq3ElwyduZYw64NZXuukuh7DG6go_6-_onZUOV72TrVUdlq7Ch30d5NbGHluHpVJ-4-LYaHzAtWzkT4-DjzJa77DahK3uTtGxkU2nz_Y5R293t6_Lh-Tp5f5xefOUKCogJiKjjLG8YEIDMwoySitgxBCiVkITbRhkghawWFTGMFNUTGleUKVgpRgXgs3R9a5XBd91QZtS2d0jMUjblATKUWE56ilHPWVGSl7uFA40_0Ovg21l6P_lLvbcu3f116DiAOYFBbEYhv0CVROERQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1088_1674_4527_ad21d5
crossref_primary_10_3390_universe7010018
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_109_064046
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12648_021_02027_y
crossref_primary_10_22531_muglajsci_1295528
crossref_primary_10_1093_mnras_staa967
crossref_primary_10_1088_1674_4527_21_11_271
crossref_primary_10_1103_PhysRevD_96_083523
crossref_primary_10_1093_mnras_stz1369
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10773_024_05801_w
Cites_doi 10.1086/161131
10.1086/116660
10.1093/mnras/278.1.27
10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083509
10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.211303
10.1023/A:1003642921142
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11981.x
10.1086/142670
10.1051/0004-6361:20041879
10.1086/150474
10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.161301
10.1086/164021
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09474.x
10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084046
10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/109
10.1086/309560
10.1086/498208
10.1086/113063
10.1086/182804
10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/380
10.1142/4948
10.1086/161130
10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2648
10.1214/aos/1176344136
10.1086/323448
10.1086/177173
10.1093/mnras/274.1.235
10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
10.1086/304888
10.1086/178131
10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/020
10.1086/168845
10.1093/mnras/249.3.523
10.1086/508988
10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084008
10.1023/A:1026672604958
10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/004
10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563
10.1088/1475-7516/2005/05/003
10.1093/mnras/278.2.488
10.1086/158003
10.1086/305986
10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137
10.1093/mnras/sts175
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13198.x
10.1086/500805
10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06165.x
10.1093/mnras/283.1.18
ContentType Journal Article
DBID 2RA
92L
CQIGP
~WA
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1088/1674-1137/41/5/055101
DatabaseName 维普期刊资源整合服务平台
中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点
维普中文期刊数据库
中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Physics
DocumentTitleAlternate Comparing dark matter models,modified Newtonian dynamics and modified gravity in accounting for galaxy rotation curves
EISSN 0254-3052
EndPage 143
ExternalDocumentID 10_1088_1674_1137_41_5_055101
672089089
GroupedDBID 02O
1JI
1WK
29B
2B.
2C.
2RA
4.4
5B3
5GY
5VR
5VS
7.M
92E
92I
92L
92Q
93N
AAGCD
AAGID
AAJIO
AAJKP
AALHV
AATNI
ABCXL
ABHWH
ABJNI
ACAFW
ACGFS
ACHIP
AENEX
AFUIB
AFYNE
AIBLX
AKPSB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATQHT
BBWZM
CCEZO
CCVFK
CEBXE
CHBEP
CJUJL
CQIGP
CRLBU
CW9
DU5
EBS
EDWGO
EJD
EPQRW
EQZZN
ER.
FA0
FEDTE
HVGLF
IJHAN
IOP
IZVLO
JCGBZ
KNG
KOT
M45
N5L
NT-
NT.
OK1
PJBAE
Q02
RIN
RNS
ROL
RPA
RW3
SY9
TCJ
TGP
W28
~WA
-SA
-SC
-S~
AAYXX
ADEQX
AEINN
AERVB
AOAED
CAJEA
CAJEC
CITATION
Q--
U1G
U5K
U5M
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-8423336738e03fc0422d031f11cb8e1ef304827099dff3f7d3ce572cc0bc35883
ISSN 1674-1137
IngestDate Thu Apr 24 22:52:53 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 03:43:19 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 14 10:03:01 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License http://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining
http://iopscience.iop.org/page/copyright
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c280t-8423336738e03fc0422d031f11cb8e1ef304827099dff3f7d3ce572cc0bc35883
Notes 11-5641/O4
We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in accounting for galaxy rotation curves.For the dark matter models,we assume NFW profile and core-modified profile for the dark halo,respectively.For the modified Newtonian dynamics models,we discuss Milgrom's MOND theory with two different interpolation functions,the standard and the simple interpolation functions.For the modified gravity,we focus on Moffat's MSTG theory.We fit these models to the observed rotation curves of 9 high-surface brightness and 9 low-surface brightness galaxies.We apply the Bayesian Information Criterion and the Akaike Information Criterion to test the goodness-of-fit of each model.It is found that none of the six models can fit all the galaxy rotation curves well.Two galaxies can be best fitted by the baryonic model without involving nonluminous dark matter.MOND can fit the largest number of galaxies,and only one galaxy can be best fitted by the MSTG model.Core-modified model fits about half the LSB galaxies well,but no HSB galaxies,while the NFW model fits only a small fraction of HSB galaxies but no LSB galaxies.This may imply that the oversimplified NFW and core-modified profiles cannot model the postulated dark matter haloes well.
galaxy galaxies rotation Newtonian gravity interpolation accounting Bayesian brightness fitted
Xin Li Li Tang Hai-Nan Lin( 1 Department of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China 2 CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1674_1137_41_5_055101
crossref_primary_10_1088_1674_1137_41_5_055101
chongqing_primary_672089089
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Chinese physics C
PublicationTitleAlternate Chinese Physica C
PublicationYear 2017
References 44
49
de Blok W. J. G. (6) 2008; 136
Merritt D. (39) 2006; 132
Palunas P. (47) 2000; 120
Swaters R. A. (19) 2010; 718
50
53
10
54
12
13
14
15
18
de Vaucouleurs G. (34) 1959; 53
Horava P. (27) 2009; 0903
1
2
3
4
Sanders R. H. (17) 1998; 503
7
8
Kun E. (48)
20
23
24
25
26
Sanders R. H. (16) 1996; 473
28
Zhao H. S. (45) 2006; 638
29
Burkert A. (38) 1995; 447
Oort J. H. (11) 1932; 6
Navarro J. F. (31) 1997; 490
Brownstein J. R. (32)
30
33
35
36
37
Moffat J. W. (21) 2005; 0505
Walter F. (5) 2008; 136
Brownstein J. R. (46) 2006; 636
Chemin L. (9) 2011; 142
Moffat J. W. (22) 2006; 0603
McGaugh S. S. (51) 2001; 122
40
41
42
Kim J. H. (52) 2007
43
References_xml – ident: 13
  doi: 10.1086/161131
– ident: 50
  doi: 10.1086/116660
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083509
– ident: 29
  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.211303
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.1023/A:1003642921142
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11981.x
– volume: 120
  start-page: 2884
  year: 2000
  ident: 47
  publication-title: Astrophys.
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1086/142670
– ident: 48
– ident: 33
  doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041879
– volume: 53
  start-page: 311
  year: 1959
  ident: 34
  publication-title: Hdb. d. Phys
– ident: 35
  doi: 10.1086/150474
– ident: 28
  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.161301
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1086/164021
– ident: 44
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09474.x
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084046
– volume: 142
  start-page: 109
  year: 2011
  ident: 9
  publication-title: AJ
  doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/109
– volume: 447
  start-page: L25
  issn: 1538-4357
  year: 1995
  ident: 38
  publication-title: Astrophys. J. Lett.
  doi: 10.1086/309560
– volume: 636
  start-page: 721
  issn: 0004-637X
  year: 2006
  ident: 46
  publication-title: ApJ
  doi: 10.1086/498208
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.1086/113063
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.1086/182804
– volume: 6
  start-page: 249
  issn: 0927-3050
  year: 1932
  ident: 11
  publication-title: Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands
– volume: 718
  start-page: 380
  issn: 0004-637X
  year: 2010
  ident: 19
  publication-title: ApJ
  doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/380
– ident: 25
  doi: 10.1142/4948
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1086/161130
– volume: 136
  start-page: 2648
  year: 2008
  ident: 6
  publication-title: AJ
  doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2648
– ident: 53
  doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
– volume: 122
  start-page: 2381
  issn: 1538-3881
  year: 2001
  ident: 51
  publication-title: AJ
  doi: 10.1086/323448
– ident: 30
  doi: 10.1086/177173
– ident: 36
  doi: 10.1093/mnras/274.1.235
– ident: 54
  doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
– volume: 490
  start-page: 493
  issn: 0004-637X
  year: 1997
  ident: 31
  publication-title: Astrophys.
  doi: 10.1086/304888
– volume: 473
  start-page: 117
  issn: 0004-637X
  year: 1996
  ident: 16
  publication-title: ApJ
  doi: 10.1086/178131
– volume: 0903
  start-page: 020
  year: 2009
  ident: 27
  publication-title: JHEP
  doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/020
– year: 2007
  ident: 52
– ident: 40
  doi: 10.1086/168845
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1093/mnras/249.3.523
– volume: 132
  start-page: 2685
  issn: 1538-3881
  year: 2006
  ident: 39
  publication-title: AJ
  doi: 10.1086/508988
– ident: 32
– ident: 26
  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084008
– ident: 23
  doi: 10.1023/A:1026672604958
– volume: 0603
  start-page: 004
  year: 2006
  ident: 22
  publication-title: JCAP
  doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/004
– volume: 136
  start-page: 2563
  year: 2008
  ident: 5
  publication-title: AJ
  doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563
– volume: 0505
  start-page: 003
  year: 2005
  ident: 21
  publication-title: JCAP
  doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/05/003
– ident: 41
  doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.2.488
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1086/158003
– volume: 503
  start-page: 97
  issn: 0004-637X
  year: 1998
  ident: 17
  publication-title: ApJ
  doi: 10.1086/305986
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137
– ident: 42
  doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts175
– ident: 43
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13198.x
– volume: 638
  start-page: L9
  issn: 1538-4357
  year: 2006
  ident: 45
  publication-title: ApJ
  doi: 10.1086/500805
– ident: 37
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06165.x
– ident: 49
  doi: 10.1093/mnras/283.1.18
SSID ssj0064088
Score 2.1266334
Snippet We compare six models(including the baryonic model,two dark matter models,two modified Newtonian dynamics models and one modified gravity model) in...
SourceID crossref
chongqing
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 135
Title Comparing dark matter models,modified Newtonian dynamics and modified gravity in accounting for galaxy rotation curves
URI http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/92043A/201705/672089089.html
Volume 41
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVIOP
  databaseName: IOP Science Platform
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 0254-3052
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064088
  issn: 1674-1137
  databaseCode: IOP
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://iopscience.iop.org/
  providerName: IOP Publishing
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nj9MwELXKIiQuKz5FdwH5gE8lbdzYsXNs2qwWDsBhV9pblDgOVAsplHYF_CJ-JjNx4nYFWgGXaGQ7dpX3OjNOxjOEvKijMrSlrgJTViYQdWyD0iZlUEgVyrou42nZBsi-iU_PxesLeTEY_NyLWtpuyrH58cdzJf-DKrQBrnhK9h-Q9ZNCA8iAL1wBYbj-FcZzV0QQNvtVsb4cfWpzZbriNggPCMsaXUzQZODi4V-5cgXoXWJm3481iNAbXzajYlc9AgMQwX4U376P1qsuKNFs11dd1GHn0bJMsFSz2YJlkiUpS0FQTCdslqCQhEzHc5adsHTOkhnLNNMwiLMsZknMtOpGax9S2_ZkLFGtoFkiR-3UAudyi6WL0bVRqWSpwkF6wVwcbv8iA4yjDxvsdG-sRMC5ywEztk4Hwv41AJV0TWELvkdMuad9uct80hly7vI__WYjQK_i64p-NSz-hEajzbEhUUXtTKMPWIzVNNT4ifQWuT0F-4FFQl69fdfb_FiEbYVTP2l_VkzriW-bCD6RE7cEZvL4sGrefwE49zyiPdfm7B457PYkdOYIdp8MbPOA3Gljg83Xh-TK04wizaijGXU0e9mTiHqS0Z5kFEhGfX9HMrps6I5kFEhGHcloTzLqSPaInJ9kZ_PToCvXEZipDjeBBs88irCKrA2j2mByuQpMRs25KbXlto5CzDkLW5KqrqNaVZGxUk2NCUsTSa2jx-SgWTX2CaHWqFhWSthCoPdUFTwxYIus5bGNlLZDcuwfX_7ZpWXJPUZDIvoHmpsu0z0WXPmYtxEXWueISY6Y5ILnMneYDMnY39bPeeMNRzf-imNyd8fyp-Rgs97aZ-DAbsrnLXd-AV2qhzM
linkProvider IOP Publishing
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+dark+matter+models%2Cmodified+Newtonian+dynamics+and+modified+gravity+in+accounting+for+galaxy+rotation+curves&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%89%A9%E7%90%86C%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=%E6%9E%97%E6%98%95+%E5%94%90%E4%B8%BD+%E6%9E%97%E6%B5%B7%E5%8D%97&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.issn=1674-1137&rft.eissn=0254-3052&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1674-1137%2F41%2F5%2F055101&rft.externalDocID=672089089
thumbnail_s http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F92043A%2F92043A.jpg