Superiority of ivermectin 1% cream over metronidazole 0·75% cream in treating inflammatory lesions of rosacea: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial

Summary Background Few therapeutic alternatives currently exist in the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (PPR). Objectives To demonstrate superiority of once‐daily ivermectin 1% cream (IVM 1%) once daily vs. twice‐daily metronidazole (MTZ 0·75%) cream, regarding percentage reduction of inflammator...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 172; no. 4; pp. 1103 - 1110
Main Authors Taieb, A., Ortonne, J.P., Ruzicka, T., Roszkiewicz, J., Berth-Jones, J., Peirone, M.H., Jacovella, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-0963
1365-2133
1365-2133
DOI10.1111/bjd.13408

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary Background Few therapeutic alternatives currently exist in the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (PPR). Objectives To demonstrate superiority of once‐daily ivermectin 1% cream (IVM 1%) once daily vs. twice‐daily metronidazole (MTZ 0·75%) cream, regarding percentage reduction of inflammatory lesions in subjects with moderate to severe PPR. Methods In this Phase 3, investigator‐blinded, randomized, parallel‐group study, subjects received IVM 1% once daily, or MTZ 0·75% twice daily over 16 weeks. Efficacy assessments were inflammatory lesion counts and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). Safety assessments included incidence of adverse events (AEs) and local tolerance parameters. Subjects evaluated their disease following a 5‐grade scale and completed questionnaires. Results A total of 962 subjects were randomized to receive IVM 1% (n = 478) or MTZ 0·75% (n = 484). At week 16, IVM 1% was significantly superior to MTZ 0·75% in terms of reduction from baseline in inflammatory lesions (83·0% vs. 73·7%; P < 0.001), observed as early as week 3 (Last Observation Carried Forward, LOCF). IGA results (subjects ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’) also favoured IVM 1%: 84·9% vs. 75·4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Incidence of AEs was comparable between groups and local tolerability was better for IVM 1%. More subjects receiving IVM rated their global improvement as ‘excellent’ or ‘good.’ Conclusions Ivermectin 1% cream was significantly superior to MTZ 0·75% cream and achieved high patient satisfaction. What's already known about this topic? Few therapeutic alternatives currently exist in treating papulopustular rosacea (PPR). What does this study add? Ivermectin 1% cream (IVM 1%) once daily was significantly superior to metronidazole 0·75% cream (MTZ 0.75%) twice‐daily, in reducing inflammatory lesion counts, as early as week 3 and through 4 months of treatment. IVM 1% cream can be considered an effective anti‐inflammatory treatment for PPR.
Bibliography:Galderma R&D
istex:7FA6228DC8AD3BE4DF12ADC212E13904AC0F00CD
ArticleID:BJD13408
ark:/67375/WNG-TV201ZFR-5
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.13408