GVM-Net: A GNN-Based Vessel Matching Network for 2D/3D Non-Rigid Coronary Artery Registration

The registration of coronary artery structures from preoperative coronary computed tomography angiography to intraoperative coronary angiography is of great interest to improve guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions. However, non-rigid deformation and discrepancies in both dimensions and to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on medical imaging Vol. 44; no. 6; pp. 2617 - 2630
Main Authors Chen, Yankai, Li, Guanyu, Li, Chunming, Yu, Wei, Fan, Zehao, Bai, Jingfeng, Tu, Shengxian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.06.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0278-0062
1558-254X
1558-254X
DOI10.1109/TMI.2025.3540906

Cover

More Information
Summary:The registration of coronary artery structures from preoperative coronary computed tomography angiography to intraoperative coronary angiography is of great interest to improve guidance in percutaneous coronary interventions. However, non-rigid deformation and discrepancies in both dimensions and topology between the two imaging modalities present a challenge in the 2D/3D coronary artery registration. In this study, we address this problem by formulating it as a centerline feature matching task and propose a GNN-based vessel matching network (GVM-Net) to establish dense correspondence between different image modalities in an end-to-end manner. GVM-Net considers centerline points as nodes in graphs and effectively models the complex topological relationships between them through attention mechanisms and message passing. Furthermore, by incorporating redundant rows and columns into the matching matrix, GVM-Net can effectively handle inconsistencies in vascular structures. We also introduce the query-based nodes grouping module, which clusters nodes in the feature space to further explore the topological relationships. GVM-Net achieves an average F1-score of 89.74% with a mean pixel distance of 0.48 pixels on the synthetic dataset with 276 data pairs and an average F1-score of 83.35% with a mean error of 1.52 mm in 55 manually labeled clinical cases, both exceeding existing feature matching methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-0062
1558-254X
1558-254X
DOI:10.1109/TMI.2025.3540906