Multimodality Imaging of Aortic Disease

Purpose of review Patients with aortic disease should have regular imaging surveillance. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the etiologies of aortic disease as well as provide information on available imaging modalities including ones that are under investigation. Recent findings A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 22; no. 10; p. 34
Main Authors Unlu, Ozan, Singh, Parmanand
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.10.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1092-8464
1534-3189
DOI10.1007/s11936-020-00831-z

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose of review Patients with aortic disease should have regular imaging surveillance. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the etiologies of aortic disease as well as provide information on available imaging modalities including ones that are under investigation. Recent findings As routine imaging is required for surveillance of aortic disease, many concerns come up including cumulative radiation and contrast exposure, as well as limitations, availability, and cost of imaging modalities. Novel hybrid imaging modalities hold promise for the prediction of complications related to aortic disease. Summary A variety of etiologies can lead to aortic disease which can cause fatal complications if not monitored regularly and intervened when appropriate. Therefore, routine imaging surveillance is critical in patients with aortic disease, especially in high-risk groups. Understanding of advantages and limitations of each imaging technique is important in choosing the right modality.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1092-8464
1534-3189
DOI:10.1007/s11936-020-00831-z