CENet: improve counting performance of X-ray surface mounted chip counter via scale favor and cell extraction

The X-ray Surface Mounted Chip Counter (X-SMDCC) relies on a counting algorithm to count the number of surface-mounted chips, enabling convenient and fast counting. It is an efficient auxiliary equipment for SMT material management. However, most existing counting algorithms use crowd counting algor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of intelligent manufacturing Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 303 - 317
Main Authors Shao, Yuanzhao, Song, Yonghong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.01.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0956-5515
1572-8145
DOI10.1007/s10845-023-02223-z

Cover

More Information
Summary:The X-ray Surface Mounted Chip Counter (X-SMDCC) relies on a counting algorithm to count the number of surface-mounted chips, enabling convenient and fast counting. It is an efficient auxiliary equipment for SMT material management. However, most existing counting algorithms use crowd counting algorithms for fine-tuning, without designing a special structure to optimize processing based on the differences and characteristics of data in crowd counting and X-SMDCC, leading to inaccurate counting results under the condition of chip scale change or adhesion. In this work, we propose a cell extraction network to address the issues of scale difference and adhesion, which improves the counting accuracy of X-SMDCC. Firstly, we present a scale-favoring module to handle scale differences between different images, as we notice that the scale difference only appears between different images. Furthermore, we propose a cell extraction module to process adhesive regions since we discovered that the human eye can process adhesive regions through comparison while labeling data. Additionally, we recommend using a shape-constrained inverse distance transform map as a learning target. We conducted numerous experiments on the SMD-Chip-179 dataset and found that our method is significantly superior to current advanced counting methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0956-5515
1572-8145
DOI:10.1007/s10845-023-02223-z