CENet: improve counting performance of X-ray surface mounted chip counter via scale favor and cell extraction
The X-ray Surface Mounted Chip Counter (X-SMDCC) relies on a counting algorithm to count the number of surface-mounted chips, enabling convenient and fast counting. It is an efficient auxiliary equipment for SMT material management. However, most existing counting algorithms use crowd counting algor...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of intelligent manufacturing Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 303 - 317 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York
Springer US
01.01.2025
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0956-5515 1572-8145 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10845-023-02223-z |
Cover
| Summary: | The X-ray Surface Mounted Chip Counter (X-SMDCC) relies on a counting algorithm to count the number of surface-mounted chips, enabling convenient and fast counting. It is an efficient auxiliary equipment for SMT material management. However, most existing counting algorithms use crowd counting algorithms for fine-tuning, without designing a special structure to optimize processing based on the differences and characteristics of data in crowd counting and X-SMDCC, leading to inaccurate counting results under the condition of chip scale change or adhesion. In this work, we propose a cell extraction network to address the issues of scale difference and adhesion, which improves the counting accuracy of X-SMDCC. Firstly, we present a scale-favoring module to handle scale differences between different images, as we notice that the scale difference only appears between different images. Furthermore, we propose a cell extraction module to process adhesive regions since we discovered that the human eye can process adhesive regions through comparison while labeling data. Additionally, we recommend using a shape-constrained inverse distance transform map as a learning target. We conducted numerous experiments on the SMD-Chip-179 dataset and found that our method is significantly superior to current advanced counting methods. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0956-5515 1572-8145 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10845-023-02223-z |