Quo vadis Web of Science? The expansion and selection criteria of the Social Science Citation Index

Web of Science has rapidly expanded its coverage of the scientific literature in the past decades. We analyze the selection criteria applied in its databases, especially the Social Science Citation Index, and discuss how changes in the coverage of the scientific literature inform us about changes in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial Science Information Vol. 64; no. 2; pp. 248 - 260
Main Author Vanderstraeten, Raf
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2025
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0539-0184
1461-7412
DOI10.1177/05390184251349017

Cover

More Information
Summary:Web of Science has rapidly expanded its coverage of the scientific literature in the past decades. We analyze the selection criteria applied in its databases, especially the Social Science Citation Index, and discuss how changes in the coverage of the scientific literature inform us about changes in the kinds of research that are being valued and prioritized. Scientometric data are presented for the period 1997–2023. These data show that ‘applied’ subject categories, such as nursing and education, educational research, have become more visible in the scientific databases, while the classic or ‘pure’ disciplines, such as anthropology and sociology, have become less visible. We argue that these changes indicate that science itself is increasingly defined in terms of its impact on the external world. Changing ideas about what constitutes good science and about the place of the social sciences in society are enhancing the status of applied disciplines and lead to their stronger presence in scientific databases.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0539-0184
1461-7412
DOI:10.1177/05390184251349017