Three questions on imagery and perception: A comment on Nanay's Mental imagery

Some parts of Bence Nanay's view of the relationship between mental imagery and perception appear iconoclastic. Other parts appear traditionalist. This commentary on his recent book Mental imagery poses three questions that put pressure on the idea that the iconoclastic parts and the traditiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMind & language Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 325 - 332
Main Author Van Leeuwen, Neil
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2025
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Bence Nanay
Imagery
imagination
Mental imagery
perception
predictive processing
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0268-1064
1468-0017
DOI10.1111/mila.12559

Cover

More Information
Summary:Some parts of Bence Nanay's view of the relationship between mental imagery and perception appear iconoclastic. Other parts appear traditionalist. This commentary on his recent book Mental imagery poses three questions that put pressure on the idea that the iconoclastic parts and the traditionalist parts can coexist harmoniously.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0268-1064
1468-0017
DOI:10.1111/mila.12559