Subhaloes are anisotropically distributed and aligned with the smooth matter distribution of their host haloes
We investigate the distributions of subhaloes about their hosts in two suites of zoom-in N-body simulations of halo growth – one suite focused on Milky Way-Mass haloes ($\sim 10^{12} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) and another focused on cluster-mass haloes ($\sim 10^{15} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) in the Sy...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 538; no. 2; pp. 963 - 975 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        United Kingdom
          Oxford University Press
    
        01.04.2025
     | 
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0035-8711 1365-8711 1365-2966 1365-2966  | 
| DOI | 10.1093/mnras/staf331 | 
Cover
| Summary: | We investigate the distributions of subhaloes about their hosts in two suites of zoom-in N-body simulations of halo growth – one suite focused on Milky Way-Mass haloes ($\sim 10^{12} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) and another focused on cluster-mass haloes ($\sim 10^{15} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) in the Symphony simulation suite. We find, in agreement with previous work on this subject, that subhaloes are distributed anisotropically about their host haloes. In particular, the positions of subhaloes lie preferentially near the major axes of their host haloes, possibly implying that satellite galaxies will exhibit a similar alignment. Furthermore, we show that in two-dimensional projection subhaloes are more likely to be observed near the halo centre (where the central galaxy presumably resides) when the host halo is projected nearly along its major axis. This projection effect is significant. Within projected radii of a few per cent of the virial radius of the host halo, the fraction of mass in subhaloes is $\sim 175~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ larger for Milky Way-mass haloes and as much as $\sim 195~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ larger for cluster haloes when projected along the major axis as compared to the average from a random projection. This result has consequences for many applications including the interpretation of gravitational lenses. Finally, we find that the orbital angular momentum vector of subhaloes is aligned with the angular momentum vector of their host halo, indicating that a significant component of a halo’s angular momentum may be carried in its subhaloes. This has consequences for galaxy formation models which use host halo angular momentum as a proxy for galaxy momentum. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | USDOE AC02-76SF00515  | 
| ISSN: | 0035-8711 1365-8711 1365-2966 1365-2966  | 
| DOI: | 10.1093/mnras/staf331 |