Subhaloes are anisotropically distributed and aligned with the smooth matter distribution of their host haloes

We investigate the distributions of subhaloes about their hosts in two suites of zoom-in N-body simulations of halo growth – one suite focused on Milky Way-Mass haloes ($\sim 10^{12} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) and another focused on cluster-mass haloes ($\sim 10^{15} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) in the Sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMonthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 538; no. 2; pp. 963 - 975
Main Authors Mezini, Lorena, Zentner, Andrew R, Wang, Kuan, Fielder, Catherine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United Kingdom Oxford University Press 01.04.2025
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0035-8711
1365-8711
1365-2966
1365-2966
DOI10.1093/mnras/staf331

Cover

More Information
Summary:We investigate the distributions of subhaloes about their hosts in two suites of zoom-in N-body simulations of halo growth – one suite focused on Milky Way-Mass haloes ($\sim 10^{12} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) and another focused on cluster-mass haloes ($\sim 10^{15} \, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$) in the Symphony simulation suite. We find, in agreement with previous work on this subject, that subhaloes are distributed anisotropically about their host haloes. In particular, the positions of subhaloes lie preferentially near the major axes of their host haloes, possibly implying that satellite galaxies will exhibit a similar alignment. Furthermore, we show that in two-dimensional projection subhaloes are more likely to be observed near the halo centre (where the central galaxy presumably resides) when the host halo is projected nearly along its major axis. This projection effect is significant. Within projected radii of a few per cent of the virial radius of the host halo, the fraction of mass in subhaloes is $\sim 175~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ larger for Milky Way-mass haloes and as much as $\sim 195~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ larger for cluster haloes when projected along the major axis as compared to the average from a random projection. This result has consequences for many applications including the interpretation of gravitational lenses. Finally, we find that the orbital angular momentum vector of subhaloes is aligned with the angular momentum vector of their host halo, indicating that a significant component of a halo’s angular momentum may be carried in its subhaloes. This has consequences for galaxy formation models which use host halo angular momentum as a proxy for galaxy momentum.
Bibliography:USDOE
AC02-76SF00515
ISSN:0035-8711
1365-8711
1365-2966
1365-2966
DOI:10.1093/mnras/staf331