Recommendations to develop a laparoscopic surgical simulation training program. Insights gained after 12 years of training surgeons

Introduction. The use of simulation in surgery has made it possible to shorten learning curves through deliberate practice. Although it has been incorporated long ago, there are still no clear recommendations to standardize its development and implementation. This manuscript aims to share recommenda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedUNAB Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 470 - 479
Main Authors Duran-Espinoza, Valentina, Montero-Jaras, Isabella, Miguieles-Schilling, Mariana, Valencia-Coronel, Brandon, Belmar-Riveros, Francisca, Gaete-Dañobeitia, Maria Inés, Jarry-Trujillo, Cristian, Varas-Cohen, Julián
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0123-7047
2382-4603
2382-4603
DOI10.29375/01237047.4514

Cover

More Information
Summary:Introduction. The use of simulation in surgery has made it possible to shorten learning curves through deliberate practice. Although it has been incorporated long ago, there are still no clear recommendations to standardize its development and implementation. This manuscript aims to share recommendations based on our experience of more than twelve years of employing and improving a methodology in laparoscopic surgical simulation. Topics for Reflection. To transfer surgical skills to a trainee, we base our methodology on a three-pillar framework: The hardware and infrastructure (tools to train with), the training program itself (what to do), and the feedback (how to improve). Implementing a cost-effective program is feasible: the hardware does not need to be high fidelity to transfer skills, but the program needs to be validated. These pillars have evolved over time by incorporating technology: the on-site guidance from experts has changed to a remote and asynchronous modality by video recording the trainee’s execution, and by enabling remote and asynchronous feedback. The feedback provider does not necessarily have to be an expert clinician in the subject, but a person previously trained to be a trainer. This allows for deliberate practice until mastery has been reached and learning curves are consolidated. Conclusions. Recommendations based on the experience of our center have been presented, explaining the framework of our strategy. Considering these suggestions, it is hoped that our simulation methodology can aid the development and implementation of effective simulation-based programs for other groups and institutions.
ISSN:0123-7047
2382-4603
2382-4603
DOI:10.29375/01237047.4514