Single‐Machine Scheduling With Positional Deadlines, Time Deadlines, and due Date Assignment for Minimizing Total Weighted Tardiness
ABSTRACT In this article, we consider single‐machine scheduling with positional deadlines and time deadlines to minimize the total weighted tardiness under the fixed due‐date assumption or the due‐date determination assumption. Specifically, we consider two models under the due‐date determination as...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Naval research logistics Vol. 72; no. 7; pp. 921 - 939 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Hoboken, USA
          John Wiley & Sons, Inc
    
        01.10.2025
     Wiley Subscription Services, Inc  | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0894-069X 1520-6750  | 
| DOI | 10.1002/nav.22257 | 
Cover
| Summary: | ABSTRACT
In this article, we consider single‐machine scheduling with positional deadlines and time deadlines to minimize the total weighted tardiness under the fixed due‐date assumption or the due‐date determination assumption. Specifically, we consider two models under the due‐date determination assumption with the due date assignment cost: unrestricted due date assignment (DIF) and common due date assignment (CON). For each problem, we show that it is unary NP$$ N\kern-0.20em P $$‐hard. Moreover, we present the complexity classification for various subproblems subject to restrictions on the weights, due dates, processing times, or due date assignment cost. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14  | 
| ISSN: | 0894-069X 1520-6750  | 
| DOI: | 10.1002/nav.22257 |