Simulation and verification of discrete element parameter calibration of pulverized coal particles

To enhance the simulation efficiency of the EDEM discrete element numerical simulation software for coal powder mineral particles, experimental data on the rest angle of coal powder particles were collected as the response variable. Five parameters related to coal powder particles within the Hertz-M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of coal preparation and utilization Vol. 45; no. 6; pp. 1244 - 1263
Main Authors Zhang, Jinxia, Wang, Qiuyue, Niu, Fusheng, Yu, Xiaodong, Chang, Zhenjia, Wu, Fan, Zhang, Mengfei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis 03.06.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1939-2699
1939-2702
DOI10.1080/19392699.2024.2379405

Cover

More Information
Summary:To enhance the simulation efficiency of the EDEM discrete element numerical simulation software for coal powder mineral particles, experimental data on the rest angle of coal powder particles were collected as the response variable. Five parameters related to coal powder particles within the Hertz-Mindlin no-slip contact model were selected for investigation. Initially, the Plackett-Burman experiment identified three parameters: collision restitution coefficient, static friction coefficient, and rolling friction coefficient, significantly influencing the resting angle. Subsequently, the steepest ascent experiment determined the significant parameter ranges as follows: the collision restitution coefficient ranged from 0.20 to 0.40, the particle-particle static friction coefficient ranged from 0.30 to 0.50, and the particle-particle dynamic friction coefficient ranged from 0.06 to 0.10. Finally, the second-order regression model for the angle of repose and the saliency parameters was developed and optimized using the Box-Behnken experimental design. The following parameter combination was obtained: the collision recovery coefficient was 0.30, the particle-particle static friction coefficient was 0.49, and the particle-particle dynamic friction coefficient was 0.09. This study aimed to compare the angle of repose between the simulation experiment and the actual experiment. The relative error was only 1.02%, indicating that the simulation experiment achieved the optimal parameter combination.
ISSN:1939-2699
1939-2702
DOI:10.1080/19392699.2024.2379405