ChatGPT and Librarians for Reference Consultations

The research aimed to explore the perspectives of students toward the utilization of ChatGPT, its potential benefits and disadvantages over traditional reference librarians. The study employed a descriptive survey research methodology and analyzed the data collected through descriptive and inferenti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternet reference services quarterly Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 131 - 147
Main Author Adetayo, Adebowale Jeremy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Binghamton Routledge 03.07.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1087-5301
1540-4749
DOI10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681

Cover

More Information
Summary:The research aimed to explore the perspectives of students toward the utilization of ChatGPT, its potential benefits and disadvantages over traditional reference librarians. The study employed a descriptive survey research methodology and analyzed the data collected through descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of the 54 students at Adeleke University surveyed, they acknowledged the advantages of ChatGPT such as its convenience, user-friendliness, extensive knowledge base, and accessibility. However, they also pointed out its limitations including the inability to comprehend emotions, limitations in answering complex questions, potential for providing incorrect answers, and risk of outdated information. Despite these drawbacks, the students still expressed their intention to seek reference assistance from ChatGPT, as well as from librarians. The research suggests that library administration should embrace technology to ensure that students have convenient access to reference services.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1087-5301
1540-4749
DOI:10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681