ChatGPT and Librarians for Reference Consultations
The research aimed to explore the perspectives of students toward the utilization of ChatGPT, its potential benefits and disadvantages over traditional reference librarians. The study employed a descriptive survey research methodology and analyzed the data collected through descriptive and inferenti...
Saved in:
Published in | Internet reference services quarterly Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 131 - 147 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Binghamton
Routledge
03.07.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1087-5301 1540-4749 |
DOI | 10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681 |
Cover
Summary: | The research aimed to explore the perspectives of students toward the utilization of ChatGPT, its potential benefits and disadvantages over traditional reference librarians. The study employed a descriptive survey research methodology and analyzed the data collected through descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of the 54 students at Adeleke University surveyed, they acknowledged the advantages of ChatGPT such as its convenience, user-friendliness, extensive knowledge base, and accessibility. However, they also pointed out its limitations including the inability to comprehend emotions, limitations in answering complex questions, potential for providing incorrect answers, and risk of outdated information. Despite these drawbacks, the students still expressed their intention to seek reference assistance from ChatGPT, as well as from librarians. The research suggests that library administration should embrace technology to ensure that students have convenient access to reference services. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1087-5301 1540-4749 |
DOI: | 10.1080/10875301.2023.2203681 |