Transient Anal Sphincter Relaxations in Fecal Incontinence: Insights From 3D High‐Definition Anorectal Manometry
Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent and multifactorial disorder, often associated with anal sphincter dysfunction. Transient anal sphincter relaxations (TASR) have been proposed as a contributing factor in FI, though their significance remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the prevalence an...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurogastroenterology and motility p. e70125 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
17.07.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1350-1925 1365-2982 1365-2982 |
DOI | 10.1111/nmo.70125 |
Cover
Summary: | Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent and multifactorial disorder, often associated with anal sphincter dysfunction. Transient anal sphincter relaxations (TASR) have been proposed as a contributing factor in FI, though their significance remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and clinical impact of TASR using high-definition anorectal manometry (3D-HD ARM).
We conducted a cross-sectional study including consecutive FI patients undergoing 3D-HD ARM. TASR was defined as a resting pressure drop below 15 mmHg lasting > 15 s. Manometric parameters, structural assessments, and clinical scores were compared between TASR and non-TASR groups.
Of 62 FI patients (74.2% female, mean age 60 years), TASR was detected in 14.5% (95% CI 0.06-0.25). TASR patients exhibited significantly lower maximum squeeze pressure (68.5 ± 25.6 vs. 105.3 ± 56.1 mmHg, p = 0.004) and reduced anal pressure during cough (54.8 ± 28.5 vs. 85.2 ± 35.9 mmHg, p = 0.019). TASR was also associated with pelvic floor akinesia (p = 0.006) and rectoanal coordination disorders (p = 0.037), though no significant structural differences were observed.
TASR was identified in 15% of FI patients, with associated anal sphincter dysfunction and pelvic floor abnormalities. The use of 3D-HD ARM may enhance TASR detection, suggesting a potential role in FI pathophysiology. Further studies are needed to determine its clinical significance and impact on treatment response, particularly regarding biofeedback therapy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1350-1925 1365-2982 1365-2982 |
DOI: | 10.1111/nmo.70125 |