Mathematics and the Collision Regulations
In the January number of the Journal (15, 104) Captain Wylie discussed the apparent conflict which existed between certain mariners and certain mathematicians about the efficacy of the Collision Regulations at sea. His contribution, which followed the publication in the October 1961 number (14, 379)...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of navigation Vol. 15; no. 3; p. 325 |
|---|---|
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
01.07.1962
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0373-4633 1469-7785 1469-7785 |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0373463300042727 |
Cover
| Summary: | In the January number of the Journal (15, 104) Captain Wylie discussed the apparent conflict which existed between certain mariners and certain mathematicians about the efficacy of the Collision Regulations at sea. His contribution, which followed the publication in the October 1961 number (14, 379) of Mr. Calvert's ‘Comparison of Two Systems for Avoiding Collision’, was discussed in the same number by a selection of seamen and mathematicians. Followers of this controversy will be interested to read the remarks of Captain Weekes, printed on p. 271 on the subject of how imperfectly many ships' officers understand relative movement. Commander Clissold's suggestion, printed in the same discussion, that Calvert's and Hollingdale's rules should be tested on marine radar simulators is also to the point. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | PII:S0373463300042727 ArticleID:04272 istex:13EFA742F16F65441B283287BF07C936BCD05F5B ark:/67375/6GQ-0KRH6B05-3 |
| ISSN: | 0373-4633 1469-7785 1469-7785 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0373463300042727 |