How is Audit Quality Perceived by Big 5 and Local Auditors in China? A Preliminary Investigation

This study seeks to determine what attributes are perceived by various groups of players in the Chinese auditing market as being important to audit quality. Attributes of audit quality were incorporated into a survey instrument which was administered to auditors from a local CPA (Certified Public Ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of auditing Vol. 5; no. 2; pp. 157 - 175
Main Authors Chen, Charles J.P., Shome, Anamitra, Su, Xijia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Science Ltd 01.07.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1090-6738
1099-1123
DOI10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00332.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study seeks to determine what attributes are perceived by various groups of players in the Chinese auditing market as being important to audit quality. Attributes of audit quality were incorporated into a survey instrument which was administered to auditors from a local CPA (Certified Public Accountant) firm and a Big 5 firm operating in Shanghai, as well as subjects belonging to another group—regulators. Results indicate that the attributes perceived as having the most positive effect on audit quality correspond to a very high degree with those identified in the prior (mostly US‐based) literature. Attributes thought to be most detrimental to audit quality, on the other hand, were developed from consultations with key players, and were unique to the Chinese context. Wide differences were observed between auditors and regulators (e.g., regulators and Big 5 auditors), but not among the independent practitioners (local CPAs and Big 5 auditors). In addition to heightening the current understanding of what attributes of audit quality are important to audit firms operating in emerging markets such as China, these findings are expected to hold significant implications for strategy formulation by public accounting firms in China, both local as well as international.
Bibliography:ArticleID:IJA332
istex:0C41C26873C4FF9D9C97E83FA2F1B9FCDDD7315E
ark:/67375/WNG-VR3NDVF1-G
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1090-6738
1099-1123
DOI:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00332.x