Implementing responsible research and innovation: a case study of U.S. biotechnology oversight

• Published in: Global Public Policy and Governance Vol. 2; no. 3; pp. 306 - 325
• Main Author: Kuzma, Jennifer
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.09.2022
• Subjects: Global Governance of Emerging Technologies; Governance and Government; Political Science and International Relations; Political Science and International Studies; Public Policy; Research Article; Policy Process Theory; Biotechnology; Governance; Genetically Modified Organisms; Gene Editing; Responsible Research and Innovation
• ISSN: 2730-6291; 2730-6305
• DOI: 10.1007/s43508-022-00046-x

This article explores two research questions through a case study of U.S. biotechnology oversight: why visions of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) are difficult to implement in governance systems for emerging technologies, and how to get policies and programs to overcome barriers to RRI implementation on the national policy agenda. Recent research on barriers to RRI is first reviewed to categorize the types of barriers. Key barriers center around meso- and macro-level institutional and societal forces that disincentivize RRI in innovation systems, as well as micro-level attitudinal and capacity barriers. These barriers point to policy changes that are likely needed to implement RRI in governance systems, in particular incentives for RRI from national funding organizations. However, getting RRI on the policy agenda for biotechnology may be difficult given macro-level socioeconomic and political forces. Therefore, the article uses insights from policy process theory to identify possible ways to get RRI on the national policy agenda. It identifies several ways to promote RRI in national policy-making, such as shifting the policy image of RRI, changing policy venues to encourage RRI, expanding the scope of RRI as a policy issue, and catalyzing focusing events to raise national awareness about RRI.