A morphosyntactic analysis of the Turkish inflectional system

This paper explores the cross-linguistically long-attested dichotomy between 1st and 2nd person on the one hand, and 3rd on the other, in the case of Turkish verbal inflection. Motivated by both syntactic and morphological data, I decompose pronouns and verbal inflectional morphology and claim that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlossa (London) Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 1 - 50
Main Author Senturia, Isabella
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Open Library of Humanities 01.08.2025
Ubiquity Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2397-1835
2397-1835
DOI10.16995/glossa.18721

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper explores the cross-linguistically long-attested dichotomy between 1st and 2nd person on the one hand, and 3rd on the other, in the case of Turkish verbal inflection. Motivated by both syntactic and morphological data, I decompose pronouns and verbal inflectional morphology and claim that 3rd person in Turkish does not have person features the way that 1st and 2nd person do. I propose a syntactic analysis for person verbal inflection: a clitic-doubling account in the case of 1st and 2nd person, and in the case of third person, that what looks like person/number agreement is really zero-number agreement coupled with cliticization. Along with this, I discuss the morphological decomposition of four different person inflection categories, giving the vocabulary items and insertion rules underlying the syncretisms across the two nominal and two verbal categories within the framework of Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz 1993; Embick 2015). 
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2397-1835
2397-1835
DOI:10.16995/glossa.18721