Clinical experience and future prospect of thrombolytic therapy using rt-PA from neurosurgeon's view

Intravenous rt-PA for acute ischemic stroke could be widely accepted as the only treatment which efficacy was proved by well-controlled clinical trials. Based on this clinical evidence, it could be major target for clinical trial how to expand the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of Stroke Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 668 - 672
Main Author Nakagawara, Jyoji
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published The Japan Stroke Society 2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0912-0726
1883-1923
1883-1923
DOI10.3995/jstroke.28.668

Cover

More Information
Summary:Intravenous rt-PA for acute ischemic stroke could be widely accepted as the only treatment which efficacy was proved by well-controlled clinical trials. Based on this clinical evidence, it could be major target for clinical trial how to expand the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Intra-arterial local fibrinolytic intervention which is not necessarily alternative treatment for intravenous rt-PA could be additional treatment for intravenous rt-PA which fails to achieve reopening of occluded vessels within therapeutic time window. Concerning on thrombolytic therapy using intravenous rt-PA, efficacy of newly developed rt-PA which might have wider therapeutic time window should be verified by randomized controlled trials. In addition to that, the combination therapy using intravenous rt-PA and brain protective agents such as free radical scavengers also should be inspected to show improvement of patients outcome or expansion of therapeutic time window. Approval of intravenous rt-PA for acute ischemic stroke in this country make a chance to discuss about local medical care system for acute stroke patients should be, and make a progress to establish primary or comprehensive stroke centers in all over the country.
ISSN:0912-0726
1883-1923
1883-1923
DOI:10.3995/jstroke.28.668