Longer orthodontic treatment may result in greater external apical root resorption What are the treatment-related aetiological factors of external apical root resorption of the maxillary incisor?

Data sources Medline was the primary data source, with references of identified papers then being reviewed for additional studies. Study selection Studies were included if they were clinical trials, in English, of samples of greater than 10 subjects who had undergone fixed appliance orthodontic trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEvidence-based dentistry Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 21
Main Author Fox, Nigel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 24.03.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1462-0049
1476-5446
DOI10.1038/sj.ebd.6400304

Cover

More Information
Summary:Data sources Medline was the primary data source, with references of identified papers then being reviewed for additional studies. Study selection Studies were included if they were clinical trials, in English, of samples of greater than 10 subjects who had undergone fixed appliance orthodontic treatment and who had both pre- and postoperative X-rays available. A measurement of external apical root resorption (EARR) in maxillary incisors was essential as was a measure of displacement with the apex of the root as reference. Data extraction and synthesis Variables were coded and articles graded by three independent investigators who subsequently negotiated final coding and assessed the methodological soundness of each study. A cumulative ‘meta-analysis factor’ was computed for each article. Articles were evaluated on study design; population sample; treatment assignment; documentation of statistics; the accuracy of root resorption measurement and apical displacement of incisor roots. A funnel plot analysis did not identify publication bias. Results Eight articles were included in the statistical analysis. Two did not contain data for mean apical displacement and therefore correlations between mean EARR and mean apical displacement could not be calculated for them. The mean meta-analysis factor was 39 (range, 12–78). Mean root resorption was 1.421±0.448 mm ( n =8), and mean apical displacement was 2.382±0.756 mm. The weighted correlation coefficient between mean root resorption and apical displacement was 0.822 and that between mean root resorption and treatment duration was 0.852. Conclusions This analysis suggests that treatment-related root resorption is correlated with the distance the apex moves and the length of time the treatment took.
ISSN:1462-0049
1476-5446
DOI:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400304