Evolution of classroom languaging over the years: Prospects for teaching mathematics differently

In this theoretical paper, we trace diverse language practices representative of equally diverse conceptions of language. To be dynamic with languaging, one should appreciate nuanced languaging practices, their challenges, and prospects. Here, we present what we envision as three major conceptions o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of education (Durban) Vol. 2024; no. 97; pp. 243 - 260
Main Authors Sibanda, Jabulani, Chikiwa, Clemence
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published University of KwaZulu-Natal 30.01.2025
University of KwaZulu-Natal on behalf of the South African Education Research Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0259-479X
2520-9868
2520-9868
DOI10.17159/2520-9868/i97a12

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this theoretical paper, we trace diverse language practices representative of equally diverse conceptions of language. To be dynamic with languaging, one should appreciate nuanced languaging practices, their challenges, and prospects. Here, we present what we envision as three major conceptions of language that give impetus to diverse language practices. We examine theoretical models of the bilingual mental lexicon and how they inform languaging practices that have been promulgated and experimented with over the years. We proceed on the premise that interactive and dynamic languaging depends on one’s nuanced beliefs, assumptions, and understandings of the concept of language, how languaging has evolved over the years, and the diverse learner profiles and the linguistic resources they bring. Because languaging is an evolving phenomenon, it is disruptive and fluid since it responds to the complexities of human experience and socio-cultural, technological, and environmental shifts characterising those experiences. Languaging offers prospects for creativity and innovation, as well as linguistic flexibility. Using mathematics as a proxy for languaging, we advocate for the deployment of multisensory semiotic systems to complement linguistic classroom communication and an acknowledgment of the validity of learners’ linguistic and semiotic resources in the learning enterprise. We demonstrate how many different linguistic, semiotic, and symbolic resources converge in classroom languaging, and how dynamic languaging has a constant and dialogic shift between and among known languages, and between formal and informal language in a fluid nature. We recommend the enactment of specific multimodal languaging clauses in education policies and curriculum documents that empower classroom interactants to exercise discretion in languaging practices.
ISSN:0259-479X
2520-9868
2520-9868
DOI:10.17159/2520-9868/i97a12