Implementing Risk-Based Maintenance Strategies for Distributed Control System as Power Plant Asset Management

The electricity generated from the power plant is subject to several requirements for active power, voltage, and frequency according to the grid system, so the machine must be controlled to achieve requirement by a power plant control system knows as Distributed Control System (DCS). DCS system in b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 1096; no. 1; p. 12108
Main Authors Yulianto, D T, Isman, R M, Ihsan, S N, Susanto, H G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bristol IOP Publishing 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1757-8981
1757-899X
1757-899X
DOI10.1088/1757-899X/1096/1/012108

Cover

More Information
Summary:The electricity generated from the power plant is subject to several requirements for active power, voltage, and frequency according to the grid system, so the machine must be controlled to achieve requirement by a power plant control system knows as Distributed Control System (DCS). DCS system in block 1 Muara Tawar power plant using Procontrol P-13 for gas turbine and Procontrol P-14 to control steam turbine. These systems had operated since 1997 and had been nearly operating for 23 years until now, and several failures tend to increase from time to time. The failures of the DCS and the lack of control cards will result in the loss of production. DCS system assets must handle properly to maintain the overall reliability of the power plant system. A method and strategy to maintain DCS must be carried out and ensure reliability and risk always under controlled conditions. Implementing Risk-based maintenance by carrying out quantitative calculations through the reliability approach and the level of the consequence of failure to calculate equipment risk is one of the methods of the DCS system. The result of Risk-based maintenance method shows the highest risk on risk map of the DCS system was in cubicle 14CBA02, 14CBA03 with a high-risk level and gas turbine and HRSG cubicle in medium-high level. The interval preventive maintenance time calculated by reliability within a year showed that cubicles 14CBA02 and 14CBA03 suggested to be maintenance every 29 days to reduce possibilities to failure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ISSN:1757-8981
1757-899X
1757-899X
DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/1096/1/012108