SU‐E‐T‐334: A Rapid Method for Testing the Accuracy of Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using a 2‐D Detector‐Array QA Tool

Purpose: To demonstrate an efficient quality assurance (QA) method using a 2‐D diode array to verify the absolute dose distribution generated by heterogeneity corrected treatment plans. Methods: The AAA, ETAR, and modified Batho heterogeneity corrected Eclipse treatment plans were compared against t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical Physics Vol. 38; no. 6; p. 3564
Main Authors Chu, A, Feng, W, Liu, W, Chen, Z, Nath, R
Format Conference Proceeding Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Association of Physicists in Medicine 01.06.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI10.1118/1.3612288

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose: To demonstrate an efficient quality assurance (QA) method using a 2‐D diode array to verify the absolute dose distribution generated by heterogeneity corrected treatment plans. Methods: The AAA, ETAR, and modified Batho heterogeneity corrected Eclipse treatment plans were compared against the measured data obtained with 6 and 18MV (Varian 2100CD) photon irradiation with the following two geometric setups: (1) Reference setup: An inhomogeneous phantom was sandwiched by a solid water slab (Gammex) and the 22×22cm2 MapCHECK detector (Sun Nuclear) under the incident photon beam that was perpendicular to the slabs. The sandwiched slab material consisted of low‐density foam occupying half of the detector area (11×22cm2), and another solid‐water slab on the other half. (2) Tested setup: two blocks of solid‐water separated by another slab of low‐density foam were erected vertically on the surface of the 2‐D array. A slightly oblique beam angle (<30o) allows primary photon field to pass through each slab of solid water and foam to project the field onto the array. Results: The measured 2‐D dose profiles from the first configuration (Reference setup) were reasonably predicted by all three algorithms, but only AAA among the three taking into account the electron transport shows the best results for the second setup. Conclusions: The geometric design of the second setup with oblique beam angle can enhance the characteristics of the complicated dose profile projected onto a 2‐D array as the transversal and longitudinal electron transports carry out non‐local dose deposit throughout inhomogeneous slabs by oblique primary photons. The combination of build‐up and build‐down profiles is usually illustrated by film dosimetry with much a more time‐consuming procedure.
ISSN:0094-2405
2473-4209
DOI:10.1118/1.3612288