Potential effect of amyloid imaging on diagnosis and intended management of patients with cognitive decline: impact of appropriate use criterion
Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study evaluated the impact of amyloid PET on diagnosis/management in patients likely to meet AUC. Methods: We examined 229 cases from a completed study...
Saved in:
Published in | Canadian journal of neurological sciences Vol. 42; no. S1; p. S10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, USA
Cambridge University Press
01.05.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0317-1671 2057-0155 |
DOI | 10.1017/cjn.2015.72 |
Cover
Abstract | Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study evaluated the impact of amyloid PET on diagnosis/management in patients likely to meet AUC. Methods: We examined 229 cases from a completed study of florbetapir amyloid PET (FBP-PET) in patients with a cognitive decline evaluation in whom Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) was suspected, but with <85% confidence in the diagnosis. All cases received a provisional diagnosis and management prior to FBP-PET. Information for 172 cases after 3-months’ follow-up was also available on actual diagnosis/management post-FBP-PET. Cases were classified as likely meeting AUC (AUC-like) or not. Results: 125/229(55%) subjects were AUC-like. NonAUC cases included typical AD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to AD, Cognitive Decline without objective evidence of impairment (CD) and dementia or cognitive impairment with specific nonAD diagnosis. 59/125(47%) AUC-like cases were amyloid positive (Aβ+). Among nonAUC cases, 29% (CD), 49%(MCI due to AD), 53%(non-AD) and 73%(typical AD) were Aβ+. Of 172 cases with follow-up information, diagnosis/management changed after FBP-PET in 58%/88% and 45%/77% of AUC-like and nonAUC, respectively. Conclusions: FBP-PET altered diagnosis/management in patients selected according to AUC. Additionally, AUC generally excluded patients with a relatively high (typical AD) or low (CD) probability of Aβ+ scan. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study evaluated the impact of amyloid PET on diagnosis/management in patients likely to meet AUC. Methods: We examined 229 cases from a completed study of florbetapir amyloid PET (FBP-PET) in patients with a cognitive decline evaluation in whom Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) was suspected, but with <85% confidence in the diagnosis. All cases received a provisional diagnosis and management prior to FBP-PET. Information for 172 cases after 3-months’ follow-up was also available on actual diagnosis/management post-FBP-PET. Cases were classified as likely meeting AUC (AUC-like) or not. Results: 125/229(55%) subjects were AUC-like. NonAUC cases included typical AD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to AD, Cognitive Decline without objective evidence of impairment (CD) and dementia or cognitive impairment with specific nonAD diagnosis. 59/125(47%) AUC-like cases were amyloid positive (Aβ+). Among nonAUC cases, 29% (CD), 49%(MCI due to AD), 53%(non-AD) and 73%(typical AD) were Aβ+. Of 172 cases with follow-up information, diagnosis/management changed after FBP-PET in 58%/88% and 45%/77% of AUC-like and nonAUC, respectively. Conclusions: FBP-PET altered diagnosis/management in patients selected according to AUC. Additionally, AUC generally excluded patients with a relatively high (typical AD) or low (CD) probability of Aβ+ scan. Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study evaluated the im pact of amyloid PET on diagnosis/management in patients likely to meet AUC. Methods: We examined 229 cases from a completed study of florbetapir amyloid PET (FBP-PET) in patients with a cognitive decline evaluation in whom Alzheimer's Disease (AD) was suspected, but with <85% confidence in the diagnosis. All cases received a provisional diagnosis and management prior to FBP-PET. Information for 172 cases after 3-months' follow-up was also available on actual diagnosis/management post-FBP-PET. Cases were classified as likely meeting AUC (AUC-like) or not. Results: 125/229(55%) subjects were AUC-like. NonAUC cases included typical AD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to AD, Cognitive Decline without objective evidence of impairment (CD) and dementia or cognitive impairment with specific nonAD diagnosis. 59/125(47%) AUC-like cases were amyloid positive (A[beta]+). Among nonAUC cases, 29% (CD), 49%(MCI due to AD), 53%(non-AD) and 73% (typical AD) were A[beta]+. Of 172 cases with follow-up information, diagnosis/management changed after FBP-PET in 58%/88% and 45%/77% of AUC-like and nonAUC, respectively. Conclusions: FBP-PET altered diagnosis/management in patients selected according to AUC. Additionally, AUC generally excluded patients with a relatively high (typical AD) or low (CD) probability of A[beta]+ scan. Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study evaluated the impact of amyloid PET on diagnosis/management in patients likely to meet AUC. Methods: We examined 229 cases from a completed study of florbetapir amyloid PET (FBP-PET) in patients with a cognitive decline evaluation in whom Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) was suspected, but with <85% confidence in the diagnosis. All cases received a provisional diagnosis and management prior to FBP-PET. Information for 172 cases after 3-months’ follow-up was also available on actual diagnosis/management post-FBP-PET. Cases were classified as likely meeting AUC (AUC-like) or not. Results: 125/229(55%) subjects were AUC-like. NonAUC cases included typical AD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to AD, Cognitive Decline without objective evidence of impairment (CD) and dementia or cognitive impairment with specific nonAD diagnosis. 59/125(47%) AUC-like cases were amyloid positive (Aβ+). Among nonAUC cases, 29% (CD), 49%(MCI due to AD), 53%(non-AD) and 73%(typical AD) were Aβ+. Of 172 cases with follow-up information, diagnosis/management changed after FBP-PET in 58%/88% and 45%/77% of AUC-like and nonAUC, respectively. Conclusions: FBP-PET altered diagnosis/management in patients selected according to AUC. Additionally, AUC generally excluded patients with a relatively high (typical AD) or low (CD) probability of Aβ+ scan. |
Author | Hunter, C Lu, M Mintun, MA Arora, AK Siderowf, A Montoya, A Pontecorvo, MJ Dell’Agnello, G |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: G surname: Dell’Agnello fullname: Dell’Agnello, G organization: (Indianapolis) – sequence: 2 givenname: MJ surname: Pontecorvo fullname: Pontecorvo, MJ organization: (Indianapolis) – sequence: 3 givenname: A surname: Siderowf fullname: Siderowf, A organization: (Indianapolis) – sequence: 4 givenname: M surname: Lu fullname: Lu, M organization: (Indianapolis) – sequence: 5 givenname: C surname: Hunter fullname: Hunter, C organization: (Indianapolis) – sequence: 6 givenname: AK surname: Arora fullname: Arora, AK organization: (Indianapolis) – sequence: 7 givenname: MA surname: Mintun fullname: Mintun, MA organization: (Indianapolis) – sequence: 8 givenname: A surname: Montoya fullname: Montoya, A organization: (Indianapolis) |
BookMark | eNp1kc2KFDEUhYOMYM_oyhcIuBGk2iT1k4o7GfyDAV3oOtxKbso0VUmZpB3mLXxk00yDMDirJOQ75x7uuSQXIQYk5CVne864fGsOYS8Y7_dSPCE7wXrZ1Fd_QXas5bLhg-TPyGXOB8bE0A_djvz5FguG4mGh6ByaQqOjsN4t0VvqV5h9mGkM1HqYQ8w-Uwj1I1SRRUtXCDDjWh1Oug2Kr9dMb335SU2cgy_-N1KLZvEB31XDDc4jti3FLXkoSI8ZqUm-YPIxPCdPHSwZX5zPK_Lj44fv15-bm6-fvly_v2kMl7Jr5DjayYnewTAxaI1SahqZa8XE3KD6ySlnFXDbdqpVfHBjN0zCMascghmUbK_I63vfmuPXEXPRq88GlwUCxmPWXCqm2nZUXUVfPUAP8ZhCTaeFVEp2g2QnQ35PmRRzTui08aUuJIaSwC-aM33qSNeO9KkjLUXVvHmgqStZId09QjdnGtYpeTvjvyD_4_8CCQ2msw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dadm_2016_12_001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc. 2015 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc. 2015 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88G 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ K9. M0S M2M PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PSYQQ Q9U 7TK |
DOI | 10.1017/cjn.2015.72 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Psychology Database (Alumni) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic Neurosciences Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic (New) Neurosciences Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest One Psychology CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central - New (Subscription) url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2057-0155 |
EndPage | S10 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1017_cjn_2015_72 |
GroupedDBID | --- 09C 09E 0R~ 29B 36B 53G 5GY 5RE 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAAZR AABES AABWE AACJH AAGFV AAKTX AARAB AASVR AAUKB ABBXD ABBZL ABJNI ABQTM ABROB ABUWG ABVKB ABVZP ABWCF ABXAU ABZCX ACBMC ACDLN ACETC ACGFS ACUIJ ACYZP ACZBM ACZUX ADAZD ADDNB ADFEC ADKIL ADOVH ADOVT ADVJH AEBAK AEHGV AENCP AENEX AENGE AEYHU AEYYC AFFUJ AFKQG AFKRA AFLOS AFLVW AFZFC AGABE AGJUD AGLWM AHIPN AHQXX AHRGI AIGNW AIHIV AIOIP AISIE AJCYY AJPFC AJQAS AKZCZ ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ANPSP AQJOH ARZZG ATUCA AUXHV AYIQA AZGZS AZQEC BBLKV BCGOX BENPR BESQT BJBOZ BLZWO BMAJL BRIRG CBIIA CCPQU CCQAD CCUQV CFAFE CFBFF CGQII CHEAL CJCSC DOHLZ DU5 DWQXO EBS EGQIC EJD EMOBN F5P FYUFA GNUQQ HMCUK IH6 IOEEP IOO IS6 JHPGK JQKCU JVRFK KAFGG KCGVB KFECR LHUNA LW7 M2M MNS NIKVX NZEOI OK1 P2P PSYQQ RCA ROL S6U SAAAG SY4 T9M UKHRP UT1 WFFJZ ZDLDU ZGI ZJOSE ZMEZD ZXP ZYDXJ AAXMD AAYXX ABGDZ ABXHF AKMAY CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PUEGO 3V. 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7TK |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1774-788dbf25fa6b0a3c999b80f32b0f695bf9fd9a1d3493916f846b2f0d9feac6973 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0317-1671 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 03:22:27 EDT 2025 Sun Jun 29 15:30:48 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:27 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:56:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jan 21 06:30:02 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | S1 |
Language | English |
License | https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1774-788dbf25fa6b0a3c999b80f32b0f695bf9fd9a1d3493916f846b2f0d9feac6973 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PQID | 2799746707 |
PQPubID | 5515555 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1790933894 proquest_journals_2799746707 crossref_citationtrail_10_1017_cjn_2015_72 crossref_primary_10_1017_cjn_2015_72 cambridge_journals_10_1017_cjn_2015_72 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20150500 2015-05-00 20150501 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2015 text: 20150500 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | New York, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, USA – name: Calgary |
PublicationTitle | Canadian journal of neurological sciences |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Can. J. Neurol. Sci |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Cambridge University Press |
SSID | ssj0026564 |
Score | 2.0421045 |
Snippet | Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study... Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study... |
SourceID | proquest crossref cambridge |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | S10 |
SubjectTerms | Alzheimer's disease CNS/CSCN Chair’s Select Abstract Presentations Cognitive ability Platform Presentations |
Title | Potential effect of amyloid imaging on diagnosis and intended management of patients with cognitive decline: impact of appropriate use criterion |
URI | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0317167115000724/type/journal_article https://www.proquest.com/docview/2799746707 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1790933894 |
Volume | 42 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 2057-0155 dateEnd: 20241004 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0026564 issn: 0317-1671 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20150101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central - New (Subscription) customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 2057-0155 dateEnd: 20241004 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0026564 issn: 0317-1671 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20150101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3dS-QwEA93Cse9yH1y6xc5EB-E3qXtpknuRbxDEUGRQ2HfSj5hxW1Xu_t_-Cc702S7COJzpk3pTCaTyW9-Q8iBqIStpGOZsU5n48LyzDhmMil5IZjU0vft3i6vqvPb8cWET1LCrUuwypVP7B21ay3myH8XQilsjcHE8fwhw65ReLuaWmi8J5s5hCpo1WKyPnBBrBLpo8AT55XIU30eUkbbOyQ_zfkvpAZesyq83J1eOud-xzn7RLZSqEhPom4_k3e--UI-XKbL8K_k6bpdINYHZCIqg7aB6hmcwKeOTmd9-yHaNtRFNN20o7qBgSZmvelsAL7gc4lftaOYmKUDqIg6j7WT_g-N5ZT9FEhDPgfDXXi67DwFv4OEz23zjdyend78O89Sg4XM5gJxmFI6EwoedGWYLi0Ei0ayUBaGhUpxE1RwSueuHCuszw0Qq5giMKcCuOtKifI72Wjaxv8g1ErmeMFgAM5f3DLNcm20VbnxwnBbjsjh8JPrtEy6OkLMRA3aqFEbtShG5GilgdommnLslnH_uvDBIDyP7Byvi-2uVLmee21QI_JzGIbFhTcmuvHtEr5PKMz4SDXefvsVO-QjzhWRkLtkY_G49HsQrSzMfm-S-2Tz7-nV9f9nUqbtsA |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LixQxEA7rCupFfOLoqhFWD0JrOv1IIoiIusy6O4uHXZhbmyeMON2jPYP4L_wl_karOt09LCze9pzqpEklVZXkq68I2RelsKV0LDHW6STntkiMYyaRsuCCSS19V-5tdlJOz_LP82K-Q_4OuTAIqxxsYmeoXWPxjvw1F0phaQwm3q1-JFg1Cl9XhxIacVkc-d-_4MjWvj38CPp9zvnBp9MP06SvKpDYVCD4UEpnAi-CLg3TmYUIyUgWMm5YKFVhggpO6dRlucKk1AAO2vDAnApgo0olMuj3CrmaZyxHrn4x3x7wIDaKdFVg-dNSpH0-IFJU229ItpoWr5CKeMvicN4bnncGnYc7uEVu9qEpfR_X0m2y4-s75Nqsf3y_S_58adaILQKZiAKhTaB6CSf-haOLZVfuiDY1dRG9t2iprqGhjrfsdDkCbfC7ns-1pXgRTEcQE3UeczX9GxrTN7shkPZ8BRtl7emm9RTsHBJMN_U9cnYpU3-f7NZN7R8QaiVzBWfQAOe9wjLNUm20VanxwhQ2m5AX4yRX_bZsqwhpExVoo0JtVIJPyMtBA5XtadGxOsf3i4X3R-FVZAO5WGxvUOV27O0CnpBnYzNsZnyh0bVvNvB_QuENk1T5w_938ZRcn57Ojqvjw5OjR-QGjhtRmHtkd_1z4x9DpLQ2T7rlScnXy94P_wAaOyld |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1baxQxFA61QvFFvOJq1QjVB2FsJnNJIoiIdWmtLX2wsG9jrrDFnVmdXcR_4e_x13nOZGaWQvGtz8kkQ07OJcl3vkPIniiFLaVjibFOJzm3RWIcM4mUBRdMaum7cm8np-Xhef55Vsy2yN8hFwZhlYNN7Ay1ayzeke9zoRSWxmBiP_SwiLOD6fvljwQrSOFL61BOI26RY__7Fxzf2ndHByDrl5xPP339eJj0FQYSmwoEIkrpTOBF0KVhOrMQLRnJQsYNC6UqTFDBKZ26LFeYoBrAWRsemFMB7FWpRAbj3iA3RZZnCCcTs81hD-KkSF0FXiAtRdrnBiJdtb1A4tW0eIO0xBtGh8ue8bJj6Lzd9A653Yep9EPcV3fJlq_vkZ2T_iH-Pvlz1qwQZwR9IiKENoHqBZz-547OF13pI9rU1EUk37yluoaGOt6408UIusHvem7XluKlMB0BTdR5zNv0b2lM5eymQAr0JSjNytN16ynYPCSbbuoH5Pxalv4h2a6b2j8i1ErmCs6gAc5-hWWapdpoq1LjhSlsNiGvxkWuehVtqwhvExVIo0JpVIJPyOtBApXtKdKxUsf3qzvvjZ2XkRnk6m67gyg3c28284S8GJtBsfG1Rte-WcP_CYW3TVLlj_8_xHOyA5pQfTk6PX5CbuG0EZC5S7ZXP9f-KQRNK_Os252UfLtudfgHr2ktmA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential+effect+of+amyloid+imaging+on+diagnosis+and+intended+management+of+patients+with+cognitive+decline%3A+impact+of+appropriate+use+criterion&rft.jtitle=Canadian+journal+of+neurological+sciences&rft.au=Dell%E2%80%99Agnello%2C+G&rft.au=Pontecorvo%2C+MJ&rft.au=Siderowf%2C+A&rft.au=Lu%2C+M&rft.date=2015-05-01&rft.pub=Cambridge+University+Press&rft.issn=0317-1671&rft.eissn=2057-0155&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S10&rft.epage=S10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2Fcjn.2015.72&rft.externalDocID=10_1017_cjn_2015_72 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0317-1671&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0317-1671&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0317-1671&client=summon |