Potential effect of amyloid imaging on diagnosis and intended management of patients with cognitive decline: impact of appropriate use criterion

Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study evaluated the impact of amyloid PET on diagnosis/management in patients likely to meet AUC. Methods: We examined 229 cases from a completed study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCanadian journal of neurological sciences Vol. 42; no. S1; p. S10
Main Authors Dell’Agnello, G, Pontecorvo, MJ, Siderowf, A, Lu, M, Hunter, C, Arora, AK, Mintun, MA, Montoya, A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.05.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0317-1671
2057-0155
DOI10.1017/cjn.2015.72

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC; Johnson et al, 2013) provide guidelines for selecting patients for whom amyloid PET could be useful. This study evaluated the impact of amyloid PET on diagnosis/management in patients likely to meet AUC. Methods: We examined 229 cases from a completed study of florbetapir amyloid PET (FBP-PET) in patients with a cognitive decline evaluation in whom Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) was suspected, but with <85% confidence in the diagnosis. All cases received a provisional diagnosis and management prior to FBP-PET. Information for 172 cases after 3-months’ follow-up was also available on actual diagnosis/management post-FBP-PET. Cases were classified as likely meeting AUC (AUC-like) or not. Results: 125/229(55%) subjects were AUC-like. NonAUC cases included typical AD, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to AD, Cognitive Decline without objective evidence of impairment (CD) and dementia or cognitive impairment with specific nonAD diagnosis. 59/125(47%) AUC-like cases were amyloid positive (Aβ+). Among nonAUC cases, 29% (CD), 49%(MCI due to AD), 53%(non-AD) and 73%(typical AD) were Aβ+. Of 172 cases with follow-up information, diagnosis/management changed after FBP-PET in 58%/88% and 45%/77% of AUC-like and nonAUC, respectively. Conclusions: FBP-PET altered diagnosis/management in patients selected according to AUC. Additionally, AUC generally excluded patients with a relatively high (typical AD) or low (CD) probability of Aβ+ scan.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0317-1671
2057-0155
DOI:10.1017/cjn.2015.72