A greedy post-processing strategy for multi-objective performance optimization of general single-server finite queueing networks

Several real-life problems are comprised of finite single-server acyclic queueing networks. The performance optimization of these queueing networks has been the subject of several studies. The present study extends the minimization of the total buffer area and overall service rates in the network si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSoft computing (Berlin, Germany) Vol. 28; no. 17-18; pp. 9483 - 9494
Main Authors Duarte, Anderson R., Cruz, Frederico R. B., Souza, Gabriel L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1432-7643
1433-7479
DOI10.1007/s00500-024-09717-9

Cover

More Information
Summary:Several real-life problems are comprised of finite single-server acyclic queueing networks. The performance optimization of these queueing networks has been the subject of several studies. The present study extends the minimization of the total buffer area and overall service rates in the network simultaneously with the maximization of throughput. It is well known that these three objectives are conflicting. This fact leads to a multi-objective approach that the literature in the area has already addressed. Nevertheless, this study aims to demonstrate that there are algorithms with low computational costs that can produce solutions more efficiently than those obtained previously. Furthermore, the provided solutions can enhance throughput by solving a stochastic knapsack problem. The greedy procedure utilizes a technique of redistributing buffers between the queues, ensuring that the overall capacity is less than or equal to the previous overall capacity; thus, one objective is improved (the throughput) without compromising the other objective (total buffer allocation). Several computational experiments attest to the quality of this proposition. In addition, we provide a comparison with previously proposed solutions.
ISSN:1432-7643
1433-7479
DOI:10.1007/s00500-024-09717-9