Feasibility of kinetic orbital bombardment

In this paper, the possible impact effects of orbital bombardment systems and their feasibility are studied. These effects are the projectile penetration into concrete and steel targets and seismic effects. The equations of motion for the re-entry of a projectile and the penetration were solved nume...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of military studies Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 1 - 15
Main Authors Koene, L., Schouten, N.V.H., Savelsberg, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Helsinki Sciendo 01.12.2024
De Gruyter Poland
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1799-3350
2242-3524
1799-3350
DOI10.2478/jms-2024-0001

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this paper, the possible impact effects of orbital bombardment systems and their feasibility are studied. These effects are the projectile penetration into concrete and steel targets and seismic effects. The equations of motion for the re-entry of a projectile and the penetration were solved numerically. The projectile penetration is modelled using the Alekseevskii–Tate model. By varying the altitude ( ), projectile length ( ), manoeuvre velocity (Δ ) and the target properties, the flight time ( ), earthquake magnitude ( ) and penetration depth ( ) are calculated. The calculations show that the impact of a tungsten alloy rod with a length of 8 m and a 0.4 m diameter results in an earthquake with a seismic magnitude of only 2.5 on the Richter scale. For concrete, the optimal result is obtained for a projectile with a length of 0.56 m. It penetrates 1.79 m with a minimal Δ trajectory. These results show that a kinetic orbital bombardment system is not feasible without major technological developments, the impact angle being a bottleneck of the concept. Moreover, one has to accept very high costs. Without any means to change the attitude of the projectile, using ICBMs or bombers shows a better penetration performance than re-entry.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1799-3350
2242-3524
1799-3350
DOI:10.2478/jms-2024-0001