For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution
We consider linear equations y = Φx where y is a given vector in ℝn and Φ is a given n × m matrix with n < m ≤ τn, and we wish to solve for x ∈ ℝm. We suppose that the columns of Φ are normalized to the unit 𝓁2‐norm, and we place uniform measure on such Φ. We prove the existence of ρ = ρ(τ) >...
Saved in:
| Published in | Communications on pure and applied mathematics Vol. 59; no. 6; pp. 797 - 829 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.06.2006
|
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0010-3640 1097-0312 |
| DOI | 10.1002/cpa.20132 |
Cover
| Summary: | We consider linear equations y = Φx where y is a given vector in ℝn and Φ is a given n × m matrix with n < m ≤ τn, and we wish to solve for x ∈ ℝm. We suppose that the columns of Φ are normalized to the unit 𝓁2‐norm, and we place uniform measure on such Φ. We prove the existence of ρ = ρ(τ) > 0 so that for large n and for all Φ's except a negligible fraction, the following property holds: For every y having a representation y = Φx0 by a coefficient vector x0 ∈ ℝm with fewer than ρ · n nonzeros, the solution x1 of the 𝓁1‐minimization problem
$${\rm min} \|x\|_{1} \;\;{subject \; to}\;\; \Phi x = y$$
is unique and equal to x0. In contrast, heuristic attempts to sparsely solve such systems—greedy algorithms and thresholding—perform poorly in this challenging setting. The techniques include the use of random proportional embeddings and almost‐spherical sections in Banach space theory, and deviation bounds for the eigenvalues of random Wishart matrices. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | istex:7E125B5D8BD30D65DE7DA225D15B2FD524CB4FF3 ark:/67375/WNG-CV4PXLGL-H ArticleID:CPA20132 ONR-MURI project National Science Foundation - No. DMS 00-77261; No. DMS 01-40698 (FRG); No. DMS 05-05303 |
| ISSN: | 0010-3640 1097-0312 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/cpa.20132 |