Beyond labels: the complexities of defining non-traditional students in higher education

This article is based on a systematic literature review of 196 publications, aimed at analysing global definitions of 'non-traditional' students (NTS) and their broader implications. NTS are often identified by characteristics such as age, educational background, or non-standard access pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWidening participation and lifelong learning Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 60 - 80
Main Authors Schaper, Sabrina, Lange, Jennifer
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Open University 20.08.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1466-6529
DOI10.5456/WPLL.27.2.60

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article is based on a systematic literature review of 196 publications, aimed at analysing global definitions of 'non-traditional' students (NTS) and their broader implications. NTS are often identified by characteristics such as age, educational background, or non-standard access pathways to higher education, but the lack of a unified definition creates ambiguity. In some contexts, these categorisations rely on comparisons to a presumed 'standard' student profile, which no longer reflects the diversity of today's student populations. This article examines how language constructs binary distinctions between traditional and non-traditional students, often reinforcing exclusionary norms while also offering potential for reimagining inclusive identities. By incorporating an intersectional perspective, the article highlights how overlapping social categories such as gender, ethnicity and socioeconomic status shape unique challenges for NTS. This complexity underscores the inadequacy of rigid definitions and the need to address structural barriers that impact student access and success. The findings advocate for a shift from deficit-oriented views and language to frameworks that value the strengths and diversity of NTS. Rethinking traditional/non-traditional binaries and critically addressing structural and linguistic factors are essential steps toward creating equitable and inclusive higher education systems.
Bibliography:1466-6529(20250820)27:2L.60;1-
ISSN:1466-6529
DOI:10.5456/WPLL.27.2.60