Development of a prototype simulator for dental education

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to fabricate a prototype robotic simulator for dental education, to test whether it could simulate mandibular movements, and to assess the possibility of the stimulator responding to stimuli during dental practice. Materials and methods. A virtual simulator mode...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTaehan Chikwa Poch'ol Hakhoe chi Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 257 - 267
Main Authors Kim, Mi-El, Sim, Jaehoon, Mon, Aein, Kim, Myung-Joo, Park, Young-Seok, Kwon, Ho-Beom, Park, Jaeheung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 대한치과보철학회 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0301-2875
2005-3789
DOI10.4047/jkap.2023.61.4.257

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose. The purpose of the study was to fabricate a prototype robotic simulator for dental education, to test whether it could simulate mandibular movements, and to assess the possibility of the stimulator responding to stimuli during dental practice. Materials and methods. A virtual simulator model was developed based on segmentation of the hard tissues using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. The simulator frame was 3D printed using polylactic acid (PLA) material, and dentiforms and silicone face skin were also inserted. Servo actuators were used to control the movements of the simulator, and the simulator’s response to dental stimuli was created by pressure and water level sensors. A water level test was performed to determine the specific threshold of the water level sensor. The mandibular movements and mandibular range of motion of the simulator were tested through computer simulation and the actual model. Results. The prototype robotic simulator consisted of an operational unit, an upper body with an electric device, a head with a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and dentiforms. The TMJ of the simulator was capable of driving two degrees of freedom, implementing rotational and translational movements. In the water level test, the specific threshold of the water level sensor was 10.35 ml. The mandibular range of motion of the simulator was 50 mm in both computer simulation and the actual model. Conclusion. Although further advancements are still required to improve its efficiency and stability, the upper-body prototype simulator has the potential to be useful in dental practice education. KCI Citation Count: 0
Bibliography:https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2023.61.4.257
ISSN:0301-2875
2005-3789
DOI:10.4047/jkap.2023.61.4.257