Reduction Loss after Extension Block Kirschner Wire Fixation for Treatment of Bony Mallet Finger

• Published in: Archives of Hand and Microsurgery Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 239 - 247
• Main Authors: Kim, Byungsung, Nho, Jae-Hwi, Jung, Ki Jin, Yun, Keonhee, Park, Eunseok, Park, Sungyong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 대한수부외과학회 01.12.2018
• Subjects: 의학일반
• ISSN: 2586-3290; 2586-3533
• DOI: 10.12790/ahm.2018.23.4.239

Purpose: We investigated occurrence of reduction loss after extension block (EB) Kirschner wire fixation or additional interfragmentary fixation (AIF) and clinical results including extension lag of the distal interphalangeal joint for treating bony mallet finger. Methods: Forty-six patients were included with a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 12-54 months). Twenty-seven patients were treated with EB K-wire fixation (Group A) while 19 patients were treated with AIF (Group B). We checked radiologic factors, such as amount of articular involvement, volar subluxation, mallet fragment angle, reduction loss, range of motion including extension lag, and functional outcomes using Crawford’s criteria. Results: Reduction loss occurred in eight patients (17%). Differences in mean extension lag, age, preoperative volar subluxation and mallet fragment angle between patients with reduction loss and those with reduction maintaining were significant. However, there were no significant differences in gender, hand dominance, amount of articular involvement, AIF, or further flexion between reduction loss and reduction maintaining. As for patterns of displacement, there was a sig-nificant relationship between gap or step-off and extension lag. Using Crawford’s evaluation criteria, functional outcomes were excellent in 31, good in 10, fair in 3, and poor in 2 patients. Conclusion: Reduction loss should be careful in older age, smaller mallet fragment angle and preoperative volar subluxation. KCI Citation Count: 0