Acquisitionism vs anti-acquisitionism: Where does phonological change occur?

In this study, I investigate the debate of the locus of linguistic change. For example, Hale (2003) and Reiss (2003) insist that linguistic change only happens during first language acquisition. On the contrary, Sankoff (2005) and Bybee (2007) argue that linguistic change occurs over the lifespans o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStudies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 51 - 67
Main Author 최재혁
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 한국음운론학회 01.04.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1226-8690
2671-616X
DOI10.17959/sppm.2018.24.1.51

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this study, I investigate the debate of the locus of linguistic change. For example, Hale (2003) and Reiss (2003) insist that linguistic change only happens during first language acquisition. On the contrary, Sankoff (2005) and Bybee (2007) argue that linguistic change occurs over the lifespans of individuals. Despite the fact that many who have written on the issues discussed in this study have argued that all endogenous linguistic change occurs in the first language acquirer, I have tried to present evidence that this is mistaken, and that change can (but need not necessarily always) occur in an adult grammar, specifically the internal grammar of speakers. KCI Citation Count: 0
Bibliography:https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/co/download/popup/poDownload.kci?storFileBean.orteFileId=KCI_ORTE002342052
ISSN:1226-8690
2671-616X
DOI:10.17959/sppm.2018.24.1.51