Acquisitionism vs anti-acquisitionism: Where does phonological change occur?
In this study, I investigate the debate of the locus of linguistic change. For example, Hale (2003) and Reiss (2003) insist that linguistic change only happens during first language acquisition. On the contrary, Sankoff (2005) and Bybee (2007) argue that linguistic change occurs over the lifespans o...
Saved in:
Published in | Studies in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 51 - 67 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
한국음운론학회
01.04.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1226-8690 2671-616X |
DOI | 10.17959/sppm.2018.24.1.51 |
Cover
Summary: | In this study, I investigate the debate of the locus of linguistic change. For example, Hale (2003) and Reiss (2003) insist that linguistic change only happens during first language acquisition. On the contrary, Sankoff (2005) and Bybee (2007) argue that linguistic change occurs over the lifespans of individuals. Despite the fact that many who have written on the issues discussed in this study have argued that all endogenous linguistic change occurs in the first language acquirer, I have tried to present evidence that this is mistaken, and that change can (but need not necessarily always) occur in an adult grammar, specifically the internal grammar of speakers. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/co/download/popup/poDownload.kci?storFileBean.orteFileId=KCI_ORTE002342052 |
ISSN: | 1226-8690 2671-616X |
DOI: | 10.17959/sppm.2018.24.1.51 |