Single-incision Robotic Cholecystectomy: Initial Experience and Results

Purpose: Continued efforts to reduce the invasiveness of conventional cholecystectomy techniques have resulted in the development of single-incision cholecystectomy. However, a single-port approach has significant limitations associated with proper triangulation and instrument crowding and collision...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of minimally invasive surgery Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 16 - 21
Main Authors Cheng, Yuan Yu, Kim, Hyung Ook, Son, Byung Ho, Shin, Jun Ho, Lee, Sung Ryol
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 대한내시경복강경외과학회 15.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2234-778X
2234-5248
DOI10.7602/jmis.2017.20.1.16

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose: Continued efforts to reduce the invasiveness of conventional cholecystectomy techniques have resulted in the development of single-incision cholecystectomy. However, a single-port approach has significant limitations associated with proper triangulation and instrument crowding and collisions. Although the da Vinci Single-Site robotic system has been proposed to overcome these problems, objective evidence of the feasibility and ergonomics of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC) is insufficient. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of SIRC by using objective data obtained from consecutive patients who underwent surgery with the single-incision robotic platform performed by a single surgeon.Methods: Forty patients who underwent SIRC between August 2014 and December 2015 were identified. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected retrospectively.Results: The mean docking time was 10.82±4.85 min (range, 4~30 min). The mean console time was 49.63±10.82 min (range, 24~90 min). None of the patients required an additional laparoscopic arm, an additional robotic arm, or conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Conclusion: SIRC can provide a safe operative procedure, good operative results, and high patient satisfaction, and cause less surgeon fatigue. Therefore, our study results indicate that SIRC is feasible and favorable for both patients and physicians. KCI Citation Count: 0
Bibliography:G704-SER000001552.2017.20.1.006
ISSN:2234-778X
2234-5248
DOI:10.7602/jmis.2017.20.1.16