The association between nurse staffing levels and the timeliness of vital signs monitoring: a retrospective observational study in the UK

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 9; no. 9; p. e032157
• Main Authors: Redfern, Oliver C, Griffiths, Peter, Maruotti, Antonello, Recio Saucedo, Alejandra, Smith, Gary B, Ball, Jane, Bloor, Karen, Böhning, Dankmar, Briggs, Jim, Dall’Ora, Chiara, Iongh, Anya De, Jones, Jeremy, Kovacs, Caroline, Meredith, Paul, Prytherch, David, Redfern, Oliver, Schmidt, Paul, Sinden, Nicky, Smith, Gary
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 27.09.2019; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Subjects: Aged; Female; Health care; Health Informatics; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data; Hospitals; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Monitoring, Physiologic - statistics & numerical data; Nurses; Nursing care; Nursing staff; Nursing Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data; Observational studies; observational study; patient deterioration; Patients; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling - statistics & numerical data; Physiology; Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies; retrospective study; Surveillance; United Kingdom; Vital Signs; Workforce planning; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK; England; patient deterioration; vital signs; Nursing staff; retrospective study; observational study
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032157

ObjectivesOmissions and delays in delivering nursing care are widely reported consequences of staffing shortages, with potentially serious impacts on patients. However, studies so far have relied almost exclusively on nurse self-reporting. Monitoring vital signs is a key part of nursing work and electronic recording provides an opportunity to objectively measure delays in care. This study aimed to determine the association between registered nurse (RN) and nursing assistant (NA) staffing levels and adherence to a vital signs monitoring protocol.DesignRetrospective observational study.Setting32 medical and surgical wards in an acute general hospital in England.Participants538 238 nursing shifts taken over 30 982 ward days.Primary and secondary outcome measuresVital signs observations were scheduled according to a protocol based on the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). The primary outcome was the daily rate of missed vital signs (overdue by ≥67% of the expected time to next observation). The secondary outcome was the daily rate of late vital signs observations (overdue by ≥33%). We undertook subgroup analysis by stratifying observations into low, medium and high acuity using NEWS.ResultsLate and missed observations were frequent, particularly in high acuity patients (median=44%). Higher levels of RN staffing, measured in hours per patient per day (HPPD), were associated with a lower rate of missed observations in all (IRR 0.983, 95% CI 0.979 to 0.987) and high acuity patients (0.982, 95% CI 0.972 to 0.992). However, levels of NA staffing were only associated with the daily rate (0.954, CI 0.949 to 0.958) of all missed observations.ConclusionsAdherence to vital signs monitoring protocols is sensitive to levels of nurse and NA staffing, although high acuity observations appeared unaffected by levels of NAs. We demonstrate that objectively measured omissions in care are related to nurse staffing levels, although the absolute effects are small.Study registrationThe data and analyses presented here were part of the larger Missed Care study (ISRCTN registration: 17930973).